Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

discntnt_irny_srcsm

(18,477 posts)
22. In my experience...
Sat Feb 6, 2021, 10:15 PM
Feb 2021

...2 out of 3 "control" advocates are hung up on the "unreasoned acceptance" (aka religious type belief) that a law will actually "control" criminal behavior. This is plainly wrong since at some point in their courses of action they point a gun at another person. I conclude that they have considered the immediate and also the eventual possible consequences and continue with the assault. Desperation can result in many unfortunate events.

I believe that this is one cause for violence that must be fought against.
Improving the lives of people especially about aspects that lead people into criminal behavior is more productive than restarting prohibition.

I know some of the restriction favoring folk justify the laws and demands for licenses and insurance with ideas about the militia and the miller decision, etc. What I can't believe is that they think some of these ideas will help.

And make it a felony to not pay your gun tax aeromanKC Feb 2021 #1
Say hello to out new QOP overlords and I don't own a firearm. LiberalArkie Feb 2021 #2
These are, I take it, your back of the napkin calculations? mr_lebowski Feb 2021 #3
I did the calculations rather quickly, but I think they're correct as per the text of the bill. Dial H For Hero Feb 2021 #6
If you only own one gun ... Straw Man Feb 2021 #30
True, but still much more accurate to say 'for 1 gun' :) nt mr_lebowski Feb 2021 #32
Link mikeysnot Feb 2021 #4
I think it might come down to registering all the person firearms. (also comes in handy if stolen) LiberalArkie Feb 2021 #5
Thanks for catching that, I edited it in. Dial H For Hero Feb 2021 #7
Yes glad you also think it is a good start! mikeysnot Feb 2021 #9
Oh, on the contrary. I do, however, appreciate that the matter can be discussed rationally Dial H For Hero Feb 2021 #13
This is some serious fantasy writing hack89 Feb 2021 #24
Sorry for the inconvenience, we are just looking for a solution to this shitshow Under The Radar Feb 2021 #8
Because gun control puts Republicans in power... krispos42 Feb 2021 #12
Your OC ideas are good ones. HR 127 not so much just a vote loser. discntnt_irny_srcsm Feb 2021 #14
If this goes anywhere, it'll be a House and (maybe) Senate loser, too. friendly_iconoclast Feb 2021 #18
In my experience... discntnt_irny_srcsm Feb 2021 #22
Why would registration stop what is happening in that picture? hack89 Feb 2021 #25
Registration is a vehicle to expose red flag applicants. Under The Radar Feb 2021 #26
The kid was breaking multiple laws hack89 Feb 2021 #28
I agree. Under The Radar Feb 2021 #29
You're missing the point. Straw Man Feb 2021 #31
The Bell Curve. aka-chmeee Feb 2021 #10
I have no problem with this at all PirateRo Feb 2021 #11
Could you please explain exactly how charging someone $50,000 or so over the course of Dial H For Hero Feb 2021 #15
It's merely antigun Orwellian bullshit, on the order of "Freedom is Slavery" and "War is Peace" friendly_iconoclast Feb 2021 #17
Note also the attempt at 'forced teaming' in the post you're replying to friendly_iconoclast Feb 2021 #19
This "protects" the 2ndA the way Republicans keep trying to "protect" women seeking abortions friendly_iconoclast Feb 2021 #16
Sounds like that "hunter" yagotme Feb 2021 #27
Sounds fair! Nt USALiberal Feb 2021 #20
Is "Screw anyone who wishes to own a firearm" fair? Dial H For Hero Feb 2021 #21
Translation discntnt_irny_srcsm Feb 2021 #23
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»H R 127 - It's far worse ...»Reply #22