Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control & RKBA

discntnt_irny_srcsm

(18,483 posts)

1. re: "...limit ownership to those of means."

Reply to sarisataka (Original post)

Fri Apr 23, 2021, 03:47 PM

Apr 2021

I know I'd feel much better about it, if I had to be shot, if it could be rich guy(girl) who shot me.

Seriously, does anyone believe that even if somehow insurance would cover intentional acts not sustained as self-defense, that once a gun was stolen or "lost"/"stolen" (aka straw bought and transferred) that said insurance would cover anything?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Firearms/ gun owner's insurance [View all] sarisataka Apr 2021 OP

re: "...limit ownership to those of means." discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2021 #1

The purpose is not a backdoor ban jmbar2 Apr 2021 #2

"The purpose is not a backdoor ban" The purpose is a de-facto means test for gun ownership... friendly_iconoclast Apr 2021 #3

If it is not a ban, it is at least sarisataka Apr 2021 #4

OK, I turn the question back to you jmbar2 Apr 2021 #5

Perhaps the same who pay for costs sarisataka Apr 2021 #7

How would you go about.... RotorHead May 2021 #9

all gun owners and dealers need to be in a risk pool IbogaProject Apr 2021 #6

I don't want to pay Hawker123 Apr 2021 #8

Bumping for relevance sarisataka Jul 2021 #10