Gun Control & RKBA

Atypical Liberal

(5,412 posts)

32. Where is the ignore function?

Reply to ellisonz (Reply #12)

Tue Dec 20, 2011, 05:08 PM

Dec 2011

I do not see it? Where is the ignore function?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

104 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Cops: Robbery suspected in fatal South Shore shooting [View all] ellisonz Dec 2011 OP

Yep - and in a state which has even stricter gun control than you would like to see... We_Have_A_Problem Dec 2011 #1

Certainly points out what a failure gun control is hack89 Dec 2011 #2

Probably stolen. ellisonz Dec 2011 #3

Probably, maybe, who gots, whatever-r-r-r....nt SteveW Dec 2011 #4

You're the one making demonstrably false suppositions about the crime rate. n/t ellisonz Dec 2011 #9

I fail to see any demonstrably false suppositions or statements he has made about the crime rate We_Have_A_Problem Dec 2011 #33

What false suppositions? Atypical Liberal Dec 2011 #34

You continue to be prima facie wrong about your assertions/accusations. nt SteveW Dec 2011 #80

So the actual criminal is not at fault here? Got it. nt hack89 Dec 2011 #5

Not exclusively - no. ellisonz Dec 2011 #7

But it is enough for you to restrict my civil rights? nt hack89 Dec 2011 #15

Is it enough for you to have innocent victims suffering from your expansive sense of civil rights? ellisonz Dec 2011 #16

I like to drink beer - am I responsible for all those killed by drunk drivers? hack89 Dec 2011 #18

What if something bad happens over and over again. ellisonz Dec 2011 #19

We restrict the rights of those who have actually done something wrong, yes We_Have_A_Problem Dec 2011 #23

Of course the problem is criminals - by definition they are the ones committing crimes. hack89 Dec 2011 #24

But not everyone else! Atypical Liberal Dec 2011 #31

We restrict alcohol in other ways. ellisonz Dec 2011 #46

The problem with your mindset vis-a-vis gun is that MicaelS Dec 2011 #59

Again, define "punishment" vs. civic responsibility. ellisonz Dec 2011 #60

"Civic responsibility" seems to be the new "moral harm" friendly_iconoclast Dec 2011 #62

Ok. ellisonz Dec 2011 #63

A barrage of propaganda is no substitute for reasoned argument. friendly_iconoclast Dec 2011 #68

Oh we've had the argument... ellisonz Dec 2011 #69

Civic responsibility MicaelS Dec 2011 #64

Analogies have limits - drinking and weak gun laws aren't the same. ellisonz Dec 2011 #66

Firearms are already handled this way. Atypical Liberal Dec 2011 #73

This message was self-deleted by its author friendly_iconoclast Dec 2011 #61

Criminality is exactly the problem one-eyed fat man Dec 2011 #35

At this point... ellisonz Dec 2011 #45

You are looking at only one side of the equation, guns also stop and deter crime ... spin Dec 2011 #52

I haven't said once that I'm against concealed carry by trained and permitted citizens. ellisonz Dec 2011 #54

we think ours are common sense gejohnston Dec 2011 #70

I'm not denying that gun violence continues at unacceptably high levels... ellisonz Dec 2011 #71

Unacceptably high levels. Atypical Liberal Dec 2011 #74

I fail to understand how limiting the number of firearms that I own will reduce crime... spin Dec 2011 #77

I think the "thought" process behind this is.... We_Have_A_Problem Dec 2011 #79

Actually, another thing that the pro-gunners are wrong about is that gun ownership rates... DanTex Dec 2011 #81

A study from the VPC? We_Have_A_Problem Dec 2011 #82

LOL... The data is from the General Social Survey. But thanks for playing! DanTex Dec 2011 #83

Oh I'm aware of the source We_Have_A_Problem Dec 2011 #84

Empirical data does not show that gun ownership is up. DanTex Dec 2011 #85

My daughter worked for the census last year... spin Dec 2011 #87

They also seem to ahve a serious inability to read the Constitution properly... ellisonz Dec 2011 #88

What do you believe is being read improperly? We_Have_A_Problem Dec 2011 #91

Please reference your own post here: ellisonz Dec 2011 #92

Your rebuttal is extremely flawed. We_Have_A_Problem Dec 2011 #93

Could just as easily one-eyed fat man Dec 2011 #6

You really need to read up on the Drug War... ellisonz Dec 2011 #8

You really need to read up on a lot of things We_Have_A_Problem Dec 2011 #11

If you don't like it you can put me on ignore... ellisonz Dec 2011 #12

Nah - i like making fun of you. We_Have_A_Problem Dec 2011 #20

Okay Charlton... ellisonz Dec 2011 #25

so what? We_Have_A_Problem Dec 2011 #30

Sombody get that man a reloading press clffrdjk Dec 2011 #48

Don't take things so literally... ellisonz Dec 2011 #58

Ya know, you're not really being a great representative of the gun culture... DanTex Dec 2011 #36

I'm not trying to be We_Have_A_Problem Dec 2011 #37

Where is the ignore function? Atypical Liberal Dec 2011 #32

Click on a poster's name at the top of a post, and several functions will petronius Dec 2011 #38

I'm not the one using the NRA playbook. ellisonz Dec 2011 #47

Can you cite this "playbook" you allude to? n/t PavePusher Dec 2011 #65

Sure. ellisonz Dec 2011 #67

Extended clips (magazines) are stupid and generally don't work very well. rl6214 Dec 2011 #103

not always gejohnston Dec 2011 #14

Red Dawn fantasies not with-standing. ellisonz Dec 2011 #17

what is your obsession with Red Dawn? gejohnston Dec 2011 #49

Work in aviation one-eyed fat man Dec 2011 #22

What is that a photo of? ellisonz Dec 2011 #26

If I'm not mistaken it is the gate to the concentration camp at Buchenwald Glassunion Dec 2011 #28

Some people had a plan to improve society, not unlike you one-eyed fat man Dec 2011 #39

My family came out of those camps... ellisonz Dec 2011 #44

My office, 1968 one-eyed fat man Dec 2011 #53

I'm done debating a one-eyed fat man... ellisonz Dec 2011 #55

We? one-eyed fat man Dec 2011 #56

Big "we." Keep cuddling your guns, the war is over dude. ellisonz Dec 2011 #57

Too bad truth is not predicated on the amount of propaganda one can bring to an argument. friendly_iconoclast Dec 2011 #75

People that have not invested their ass in the country look at it differently. era veteran Dec 2011 #76

Thank you for both your service *and* your principled protest. friendly_iconoclast Dec 2011 #86

The same could be said about my generations Vietnam... ellisonz Dec 2011 #90

Not really We_Have_A_Problem Dec 2011 #94

Thank you for chiming in. ellisonz Dec 2011 #89

I'll answer: We_Have_A_Problem Dec 2011 #95

Why are you answering questions asked of someone else? ellisonz Dec 2011 #96

Because this is an open forum We_Have_A_Problem Dec 2011 #97

Since... ellisonz Dec 2011 #98

If I'm reasonable I must be over the hill. LOL era veteran Dec 2011 #99

lol... ellisonz Dec 2011 #100

And how do you arrive at that conclusion? We_Have_A_Problem Dec 2011 #10

The best damn security money can buy. ellisonz Dec 2011 #13

Uh no - we dont We_Have_A_Problem Dec 2011 #21

It could be easily done for new firearms... ellisonz Dec 2011 #27

No, it cannot We_Have_A_Problem Dec 2011 #29

Then why do very little to reduce the number of victims in the first place... ellisonz Dec 2011 #43

What you fail to realize is that if all guns were somehow magically disappeared... LAGC Dec 2011 #50

Cite that, if you can.... n/t PavePusher Dec 2011 #41

I've had a secured gun stolen. What's my moral culpability? n/t PavePusher Dec 2011 #40

Less. ellisonz Dec 2011 #42

None. There, fixed it for you. PavePusher Dec 2011 #51

Purely speculation rl6214 Dec 2011 #102

Homicide does not require a firearm. Remmah2 Dec 2011 #72

Probably belonged to the Antioch Baptist Church era veteran Dec 2011 #78

Wow, maybe we can pass a law making it illegal to shoot someone in the head rl6214 Dec 2011 #101

What do New York, Chicago and DC have in common? DissedByBush Dec 2011 #104