Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Ohio shooting of girl in Amish buggy a homicide [View all]ellisonz
(27,776 posts)1. Go Federal.
- and yes, there is evidence -http://articles.sfgate.com/2005-07-21/bay-area/17382333_1_grand-jury-witnesses-homicide-charges - but as we should know correlation and causation are messy business. Please read this before replying to me any further with requests for statistical evidence: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_arguments_of_gun_politics_in_the_United_States#Logical_Pitfalls_in_the_Gun-Violence_Debate
2. Not for illegal diversion, not for stockpiling, not for entertainment purposes. Why do you need a dozen firearms unless you're an antique collector?
3. Yes. Medical diagnosis. You and I both know that our mental health system is failing. Take Jared Lee Loughner and Seung-Hui Cho for example - would have never passed. You're not seriously suggesting we allow the deranged to possess guns to defend themselves? I'm not trying to deny legitimate users - I'm trying to stop the mentally ill and those who want weapons to cause others harm (that's the idea behind waiting periods)
4. There would certainly be less in circulation at one time and again you'd need proof that you're a legal owner to buy. "Both Illinois and Massachusetts require people to display a firearm identification card when purchasing ammunition. The card is comparable to a permit. Applicants must meet specified criteria to be eligible for a card, including a criminal history record check requirement." Say it again: Federal
- http://www.cga.ct.gov/2007/rpt/2007-R-0217.htm
5. Are you against trying to fight illegal gun sales?
6. How is a user-fee unreasonable - are you scared of the Republican pro-gun lobby? I think the bigger issue is Democrats not taking a strong stance on this issue
7. I only had 6 points - so you get a cartoon:
