Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Silencing the Guns [View all]sarisataka
(22,696 posts)118. Acutaly what I said was
Hi-cap mags (I would be willing to negotiate on this one although I do believe when it was imposed before the complaint was people were buying larger "more lethal" calibers)
Not
I for one think it's fucking ridiculous that you can't appreciate the argument against hi-capacity rounds. Thank you for proving my point that you are in fact unreasonable when it comes to this issue
And I thought we were becoming friends
My point was when Hi-cap mags were limited (in a very ineffective way) the gun control crowd became upset that guns started being made smaller i.e. more concealable, and in larger calibers.
So assume Brady utopia- all hi-cap mags are banned, no grandfathering even*poof, gone*. Will the next tragedy require that a gun must be at least 15 inches long and weigh a minimum of 6 pounds? Or no caliber larger than a spitball?
Sliding the slope again.
individual states should be free to make a determination about what regulations they want in that regard
Um... isn't that what we have, you just don't like it?
irresponsible regulations of many states clearly is resulting in trans-state trafficking and that is a function of interstate commerce
Do you want the Congress that just passed HR 222 to step in and create a national standard?
I must bring up the irony that Brady, VPC... who have been screaming for national magazine limits, assault gun bans, FBI, NCIS, LMNOP background checks had a complete cow that HR 222 violates state rights.
Police chiefs=political appointees. They will mirror the mayors stance whether pro or anti.
I am sure you are aware of the NRA's Armed Citizen column which prints several self defense reports monthly with references to the news source so I won't bother you with other similar sites.
I simply say consider the cautionary tale of George Zimmerman.
Here we finally do agree. With rights come responsibilities and with abuse of rights there should follow consequences. If the law allows abuse without consequence it should be changed. That does not mean throw it out completely.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
135 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Was Loughner able to discharge a lot of rounds in rapid succession without reloading?
baldguy
Mar 2012
#19
So you think we should liberalize laws regarding silencers? I must say, that's quite refreshi...
Johnny Rico
Mar 2012
#7
I'd imagine those parts of Europe generally have much stricter gun control. n/t
ellisonz
Mar 2012
#44
They certainly do...but in this particular respect (silencers) their laws are more rational.
Johnny Rico
Mar 2012
#63
Good article. And I see that the right-wing talking points have arrived right on cue!
DanTex
Mar 2012
#57
As far as I can tell, the "inaccuracy" amounts to failing to mention the loophole in...
DanTex
Mar 2012
#68
Number od posts does not seem to correlate closely with factual accuracy....
PavePusher
Mar 2012
#85
Anti-gun types are fond of making spree killers reload, aren't they?
friendly_iconoclast
Mar 2012
#132