Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Another Florida CCW permit holder stands their ground, kills assailant. [View all]pipoman
(16,038 posts)69. Yeah,
16 year olds account for a fair portion of all murders..

http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/homicide/teens.cfm
And no, this incident will change many lives, including that of the shooter. The vast majority of people who have guns for defense never want to use them, just like people with fire extinguishers want to use them. Everyone who uses a gun to kill someone justifiably or not regrets it...I've only met one person who claims to not regret any murders he committed, he's in a cell in AdMax, Florence for the rest of his life. The other 10 people I have known, who killed people all visibly regretted and/or second guessed their actions. Some were obviously to everyone justified killings...they still second guess themselves to this day.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
133 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Another Florida CCW permit holder stands their ground, kills assailant. [View all]
Atypical Liberal
Apr 2012
OP
"Good for the store owner!" Maybe, except that a major can of worms has now been opened.
teddy51
Apr 2012
#1
It may have been "legally justified", but morally justified to kill a 16 yo WIthOUT REGRET?
hlthe2b
Apr 2012
#10
"I know the police does not teach non-lethal wounding shots in most jurisdictions anymore..."
PavePusher
Apr 2012
#17
I'm sorry that you live your life without compassion and in constant fear.
sinkingfeeling
Apr 2012
#42
I hope we will replace deadly 'tools' as well. However, I will continue
sinkingfeeling
Apr 2012
#100
I respect your choice. I hope you will respect the choice of others who think differently.
Atypical Liberal
Apr 2012
#103
If the person holding the gun/knife/bat didn't make you think that you actually expected..
X_Digger
Apr 2012
#41
Maybe they would kill me and maybe they wouldn't. If their aim was solely to
sinkingfeeling
Apr 2012
#45
Can the victim trust a person who has threatened to kill them, and is holding a weapon ready
AtheistCrusader
Apr 2012
#133
His death was an unfortunate but justifiable result of HIS BAD CHOICE to point a gun at the clerk
slackmaster
Apr 2012
#104
Threating violent force against a fellow human being for such small sums sure as hell is.
Callisto32
Apr 2012
#90
As I stated up-thread, you and I don't agree on even basic definitions.
sinkingfeeling
Apr 2012
#102
Read the entire definition. Things most certainly can and are 'morally reprehensible'.
sinkingfeeling
Apr 2012
#124
In this case, a 16-year-old CHOSE to pick up an "evil" tool and use it for an unlawful purpose
slackmaster
Apr 2012
#107
IMHO, it's still in the gun. My belief system says people cannot be 'evil' nor
sinkingfeeling
Apr 2012
#108
You imply that force in defense is morally equivalent to force used in offensive crime.
PavePusher
Apr 2012
#117
"you seem to have a serious problem with moral relativism clouding your judgement. "
Starboard Tack
Apr 2012
#40
No one is saying it wasn't a tragic situation. I am merely celebrating the outcome.
Atypical Liberal
Apr 2012
#92
So....are you telling us you are a sociopath and are going to join your own kind?
eqfan592
Apr 2012
#61