Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Security is Important at Political Conventions-But Not in Florida-Bring that Gun to Your Protest [View all]rrneck
(17,671 posts)47. Ok.
1. Regarding your first point, why the distinction between the two spaces?
One can and should be controlled, the other cannot.
2. True- but even more reason for restricting the guns. Do we need another Zimmerman so we can have weak laws and enable him or her to get off?
Fine lovely and marvelous. See #1.
3. Regarding your third point, they CAN'T bring a gun into the Convention!!!!!
So what's the problem? Oh, I see, the problem is you want to parse the issue into oblivion. From your OP:
Apparently you were born before 2010 when there was a brouhaha regarding the carriage of firearms to political rallies. You're late to the piss and moan party.
If you actually wanted to see Democrats elected, you'd give it a rest. This OP, like your position, is a politically tone deaf exercise in sanctimonious self congratulation.
One can and should be controlled, the other cannot.
2. True- but even more reason for restricting the guns. Do we need another Zimmerman so we can have weak laws and enable him or her to get off?
Fine lovely and marvelous. See #1.
3. Regarding your third point, they CAN'T bring a gun into the Convention!!!!!
So what's the problem? Oh, I see, the problem is you want to parse the issue into oblivion. From your OP:
From today's NY Times editorial page: "Tampa officials wanted to ban handguns outside the convention hall (the Secret Service has undisputed power to ban weapons inside the hall) but came up against the state law, which imposes $100,000 fines on local governments that try to meet such obvious public-safety needs.
Apparently you were born before 2010 when there was a brouhaha regarding the carriage of firearms to political rallies. You're late to the piss and moan party.
If you actually wanted to see Democrats elected, you'd give it a rest. This OP, like your position, is a politically tone deaf exercise in sanctimonious self congratulation.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
146 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Security is Important at Political Conventions-But Not in Florida-Bring that Gun to Your Protest [View all]
fightthegoodfightnow
Apr 2012
OP
He has to be quite about his convictions about things in his town?
fightthegoodfightnow
Apr 2012
#91
Do you want anybody with an internet connection to be able to scroll through them?
krispos42
Apr 2012
#107
Threatening people is behavior that can and is defined as crime. Feelings result from choices.
slackmaster
Apr 2012
#42
Bad behavior is threatening. Bad behavior with guns is much more threatening.
slackmaster
Apr 2012
#48
Sugar to me would be much more threatening, if consumed since I am Type 1 diabetic.
rl6214
Apr 2012
#104
I can't see why republicans would ban guns inside the convention. That would piss off the NRA.
AlinPA
Apr 2012
#30
How Many People have used SYG Laws who would otherwise have been charged?
fightthegoodfightnow
Apr 2012
#136
He would claim Martin knocked him down, beating him, and he couldn't get away..
X_Digger
Apr 2012
#132