Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Trayvon in Tulsa? [View all]Atypical Liberal
(5,412 posts)25. So you are saying it is the deterrant of getting caught?
So you are saying that criminals stop committing crimes out of fear of prison, but not out of fear of dying?
I agree with you that the police (and in fact the infrastructure of the entire justice system) is largely responsible for keeping the peace in that it is what gives the foundation for a society based on law and order.
In a society without law and order you end up with anarchy such as you see in Somalia.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
47 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Well, we could just opt for a POLICE STATE where only the police can legally possess guns...
LAGC
Apr 2012
#15
"I imagine that would make the streets quite a bit safer, but at what cost?"
Starboard Tack
Apr 2012
#24
Why did UK have even less crime, including violent crime, before any gun laws?
Starboard Tack
Apr 2012
#34
Not so, 96% of population walk around in public everyday without need for a gun. They do fine.
Hoyt
Apr 2012
#5
96% of the population drive in cars without having car accidents, too.
Atypical Liberal
Apr 2012
#26