Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

discntnt_irny_srcsm

(18,744 posts)
25. Didn't say...
Sun Apr 15, 2012, 12:43 PM
Apr 2012

...I didn't find it; just highlighting that the sole substance of your reply is a combination of advertising and obfuscation.

You can stop now, further confirmation of that point from the OP is only redundant.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The evil Assault Weapons "Loophole" [View all] discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2012 OP
So, why do gun stores and gun marketers use the term "assault weapons" or "tactical weapons"? Hoyt Apr 2012 #1
"The definition is pretty clear to me..." PavePusher Apr 2012 #3
Good luck -- CokeMachine Apr 2012 #4
It's a beautiful day here in southern Arizona...... I got lots to do. PavePusher Apr 2012 #6
writing EPRs are such a blast gejohnston Apr 2012 #9
That... was so on-target. Where did you hide the cameras? Please get out of my building... PavePusher Apr 2012 #13
That is an absolute scream discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2012 #45
'why do gun stores and gun marketers use the term "assault weapons"' PavePusher Apr 2012 #5
As they say, "goggle is your friend." Now, you should go gunless for 6 months. Hoyt Apr 2012 #7
Your google-fu is weak. ManiacJoe Apr 2012 #40
If your vision is no better than that, you should not carry a gun. Hoyt Apr 2012 #42
You might be confusing "assault rifle" and "assault weapon". ManiacJoe Apr 2012 #48
MIGHT??? discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2012 #49
Why? discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2012 #11
I gave you links a few minutes ago. Try to keep up. Hoyt Apr 2012 #12
As much as your 'on target' characterization... discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2012 #14
Post # 7. Jeeeeez Hoyt Apr 2012 #20
Didn't say... discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2012 #25
Having more closely... discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2012 #50
Assault weapon, assault rifle, assault pistol, guns sold with name assault -- all the same. Hoyt Apr 2012 #51
Since it was the gun control proponents... discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2012 #52
Well Mr. "Pro-rights," what does it say about you guys if you buy guns based upon appearance? Hoyt Apr 2012 #53
Well Mr. "no-rights"... discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2012 #55
I have never seen Assault Weapon used in a positive marketing context for firearms ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2012 #15
See post # 7, and you too can apologize for being wrong again. Hoyt Apr 2012 #21
Ok point conceeded sarisataka Apr 2012 #22
Waiting... sarisataka Apr 2012 #46
Still waiting... sarisataka Apr 2012 #54
If I really wanted to enact a "better" ban (and I certainly don't!) it wouldn't be that hard Johnny Rico Apr 2012 #2
So, you'd continue buying them on the black market? How law-abiding of you. Hoyt Apr 2012 #8
When did I say I would do such a thing? Support your accusation or retract it. Johnny Rico Apr 2012 #10
You'll wait forever...he does this all the time. ileus Apr 2012 #18
More false accusations against upstanding DU members? ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2012 #16
you of course meant to say baser, gunner, toter, hidden criminal members...right? ileus Apr 2012 #23
Why should I aspire to being "law-abiding"? Kurt Hofmann Apr 2012 #19
Welcome to DU discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2012 #24
Thank you. Kurt Hofmann Apr 2012 #26
Best regards discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2012 #28
Thanks again Kurt Hofmann Apr 2012 #44
Welcome to DU!! CokeMachine Apr 2012 #35
A happy welcome to you... discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2012 #36
Thank You!! CokeMachine Apr 2012 #56
Once again Kurt Hofmann Apr 2012 #37
Hoyt, I'm still waiting. Either support your assertion that I said I woud do such a thing Johnny Rico Apr 2012 #43
Still waiting, Hoyt... Johnny Rico Apr 2012 #47
Not going to retract a false accusation? Doesn't do much for your credibility. Johnny Rico Apr 2012 #57
BTW... discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2012 #58
"...what matters is functionality, not appearances." discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2012 #27
Correction: the manufacture of magazines with capacities greater than 10 rounds was banned. Johnny Rico Apr 2012 #30
Also banned... discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2012 #31
The sale of such magazines was not prohibited at the national level. Johnny Rico Apr 2012 #32
Exactly! discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2012 #33
I remember those mags, marked "Law Enforcement Only" Johnny Rico Apr 2012 #34
Included in the description" "large capacity ammunition feeding device" oneshooter Apr 2012 #38
I thought the ban only applied to detachable magazines, not tubular ones. Johnny Rico Apr 2012 #39
originally there were no exceptions, other than the one for LE and oneshooter Apr 2012 #41
I call them recreational firearms... ileus Apr 2012 #17
You again try to confuse the discussion with facts. discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2012 #29
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»The evil Assault Weapons ...»Reply #25