Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Gun Control is NOT Dead [View all]gejohnston
(17,502 posts)55. actually one or two
most of them have been felons challenging the Gun Control Act of 1968 and the Federal Firearms Act of 1938 because they were busted for, felon in possession or some other disqualifying factor under federal law. It is nothing new. There is a Miller v Texas in 1894, where Miller (not the same Miller in 1939) challenged Texas' handgun licensing law. The point of the appeal escapes me because having a unlicensed handgun was the least of his problems.
He was a white guy with a SO of color and he was convicted of killing a Dallas cop.
http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/153/535/case.html
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
55 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
What do you think the chances are of getting a "near complete ban" on handguns?
Johnny Rico
Apr 2012
#5
It's only the Promise the Democratic Party Made on How We Will Govern for FOUR Years
fightthegoodfightnow
Apr 2012
#26
I get that from the actual legislation that Frank Lautenberg keeps proposing, dear.
X_Digger
Apr 2012
#32
Actually it does. That's the only legislation that even *mentions* terrorism and guns.
X_Digger
Apr 2012
#36
I disagree with a couple of provisions. Free trade and gun control immediately come to mind.
X_Digger
Apr 2012
#47