Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: America's deadly devotion to guns. [View all]X_Digger
(18,585 posts)88. You can stand it when someone actually shows you how wrong you are, can you?
You're arguing the law with a lawyer in another thread; you didn't realize how many people are injured in sports, and now you have to heft those goal posts to try to make your argument.
Even if we *quadruple* the number of basketballs, you're still left with a ratio of ~300 to 1, compared to firearms, or if we remove firearm crimes (apples to apples), it's 100,000 to 1. (12% of basketballs v 0.00014% of guns). -- 35,000 accidental firearms injuries compared to 530,000 basketball injuries.
Hell, let me normalize the rate. For basketballs that's 50,000 injuries per 100,000 basketballs. For guns (including crimes) that's 121 per 100,000. For guns (without crimes) that's 12 per 100,000.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
105 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If members of so-called NBPanthers had killed an unarmed person, they would have been prosecuted.
Hoyt
Apr 2012
#7
I witnessed a friend of my father running through the woods and shooting deer
RegieRocker
Apr 2012
#42
How about we take the number of basketballs sold in the last 5 years? Since those older than that..
X_Digger
Apr 2012
#73
Hell, if I wanted to remove non-equivalence, I'd take out crimes committed with guns.
X_Digger
Apr 2012
#85
It's not for him, he's telling lawyers they're wrong about law in another thread.
X_Digger
Apr 2012
#74
NO, guns are designed to get a projectile from Point A to Point B really quickly.
Common Sense Party
May 2012
#99
Your post is childish drivel, a common reaction of those who realize they have lost an argument.
Common Sense Party
May 2012
#101
After the first 2 sentences I suspect the author requires the following form:
Callisto32
Apr 2012
#32