Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: America's deadly devotion to guns. [View all]gejohnston
(17,502 posts)89. education for you
Miller decided nothing, that is why both sides claimed it a victory. Miller only said a sawed offed shotgun was not a protected weapon. Miller was dead, so counsel did not give argument or file a brief.
Presser was a "states rights" case about private armies.
Cruickshank was also a "states rights". It made the civil rights laws at the time unenforceable. Cruickshank was one of the worst SCOTUS decisions because it made Jim Crow possible.
The First Amendment right to assembly was not intended to limit the powers of the State governments in respect to their own citizens and the Second Amendment has no other effect than to restrict the powers of the national government.
Nothing about well regulated militia there
The fourteenth amendment prohibits a State from depriving any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; but this adds nothing to the rights of one citizen as against another.
made civil rights laws of the time unenforceable.
Heller did not over turn Cruickshank, McDonald did. Actually, McDonald finished it off, parts of Cruickshank have been overturned since the 1930s.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
105 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If members of so-called NBPanthers had killed an unarmed person, they would have been prosecuted.
Hoyt
Apr 2012
#7
I witnessed a friend of my father running through the woods and shooting deer
RegieRocker
Apr 2012
#42
How about we take the number of basketballs sold in the last 5 years? Since those older than that..
X_Digger
Apr 2012
#73
Hell, if I wanted to remove non-equivalence, I'd take out crimes committed with guns.
X_Digger
Apr 2012
#85
It's not for him, he's telling lawyers they're wrong about law in another thread.
X_Digger
Apr 2012
#74
NO, guns are designed to get a projectile from Point A to Point B really quickly.
Common Sense Party
May 2012
#99
Your post is childish drivel, a common reaction of those who realize they have lost an argument.
Common Sense Party
May 2012
#101
After the first 2 sentences I suspect the author requires the following form:
Callisto32
Apr 2012
#32