Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

iverglas

(38,549 posts)
29. well, on March 29
Mon Apr 30, 2012, 08:29 PM
Apr 2012

I was bashing away like a madwoman trying to get my billing done before govt fiscal year-end, to avoid being throttled by marauding clerks.

There's a false dichotomy in that discussion, though. Shoot in the head vs. shoot over the head.

Not shoot at all is always an option. In the Alabama case, try just yelling. Presumably the would-be camp raiders, or whatever they were doing, had counted on obtaining vacant possession of the premises and finding there was occupation might well have changed their minds. In the case in that thread, wait a tiny instant to see whether the person who broke down the door turns tail upon seeing the gun ("So once he came inside my house, I shot him&quot .


Here's my big question in this case:

http://www2.wkrg.com/news/2012/apr/20/4/men-involved-summer-moody-shooting-identified-ar-3644145/

News 5 did some digging and we learned William Hearn has a criminal record. He was arrested in Lawrenceville, Georgia, outside Atlanta, in 1996 for trafficking cocaine and possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony. Hearn was then arrested in Semmes in 2010 because he failed to check in with his probation officer for three months.

He is the one whose shot killed Moody.

Why did he have a firearm, and why is he not being charged in connection with his possession of the firearm?

Just seems to me like a case where his credibility could do with a little trial by jury.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

That's ridiculous Politicalboi Apr 2012 #1
In Alabama, you can't be charged with a civil suit. Atypical Liberal Apr 2012 #3
But this was ruled an accident not SYG Logical Apr 2012 #5
I was thinking... discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2012 #7
I assumed since they were shooting in defense of property Atypical Liberal Apr 2012 #30
Nothing but murder Angry Dragon Apr 2012 #2
Manslaughter at best - not murder. hack89 Apr 2012 #4
Yea didn't know she was there, but hit her right square in the head. BS. Hoyt Apr 2012 #8
It's the boys that could be charged with murder hack89 Apr 2012 #9
B&E is not a felony I do not think Angry Dragon Apr 2012 #17
Last time I checked gejohnston Apr 2012 #18
Which means they may be charged with murder/some other charge. shadowrider Apr 2012 #20
2 firearms and a knife. Atypical Liberal Apr 2012 #31
Burglary generally is. Callisto32 May 2012 #46
other than "noises" what proof is there that the boys were commiting burglary? frylock Apr 2012 #22
There is a reason I said "if it is determined" hack89 Apr 2012 #34
Police reports listed stolen items ... DonP Apr 2012 #41
I hope they pay a price somewhere down the road. TheCowsCameHome Apr 2012 #6
they just might gejohnston Apr 2012 #25
Hope so. Hoyt Apr 2012 #42
Hope so about the ATF and felon in possession? gejohnston Apr 2012 #43
your toon is apt Doctor_J May 2012 #64
I trust you have as much gejohnston May 2012 #67
Bad call by all concerned. Starboard Tack Apr 2012 #10
Can you show where "warning shot" is defined in the legal code? nt hack89 Apr 2012 #12
It it seems that warning shots are legal gejohnston Apr 2012 #23
Shots that hit unarmed people in the head should be illegal Doctor_J May 2012 #60
I didn't say I agreed with it gejohnston May 2012 #62
No. I don't think it is defined. Starboard Tack Apr 2012 #36
in other words gejohnston Apr 2012 #38
Indeed Starboard Tack Apr 2012 #39
How is the federal investigation going? gejohnston Apr 2012 #11
"accidental shooting"? iverglas Apr 2012 #13
In case you haven't noticed, Canada is not Alabama. n/t shadowrider Apr 2012 #14
ah iverglas Apr 2012 #16
Strawman. I never said what you said I said shadowrider Apr 2012 #19
absolutely; no more nor less than nothing iverglas Apr 2012 #21
Alabama is Alabama iverglas Apr 2012 #24
could be because they claimed "warning shots" gejohnston Apr 2012 #26
but nonsense iverglas Apr 2012 #27
we agree on that gejohnston Apr 2012 #28
well, on March 29 iverglas Apr 2012 #29
to answer your question gejohnston Apr 2012 #32
thank the Goddess for her favors.... Scout May 2012 #51
Regional bigotry? Really? n/t PavePusher May 2012 #52
Consider the source n/t shadowrider May 2012 #53
just because I can't resist iverglas May 2012 #65
And you endorse the vileness. PavePusher May 2012 #70
Why should we care what the law is in Canada. I for one oneshooter Apr 2012 #33
Used to be my territory...in the 90's. ileus Apr 2012 #35
LOL Have you ever been to Canada? Starboard Tack Apr 2012 #37
Never been there, don't plan to either. oneshooter Apr 2012 #40
You base your ideas about Canada on people you argue with in a gun forum? Starboard Tack May 2012 #45
They represent Canada on this forum. I find them mostly crude and foul mouthed. oneshooter May 2012 #47
Your insightfulness is astounding. Starboard Tack May 2012 #49
imagine if us furriners ... iverglas May 2012 #48
OMG Starboard Tack May 2012 #50
Je dirais leur donnent une pause, pas tous les Américains sont des imbéciles.Jjuste une pluralité sarisataka May 2012 #54
LOL Starboard Tack May 2012 #55
Once again an unarmed person is dead after being shot, Doctor_J May 2012 #58
I dislike this, for a couple of reasons: mainly, because I have a high petronius Apr 2012 #15
I don't like "warning shots" mvccd1000 May 2012 #44
So the SYG laws now apply to shooting people who are running away Doctor_J May 2012 #56
catch a clue gejohnston May 2012 #59
Really? Doctor_J May 2012 #63
I fail to see the humor in gejohnston May 2012 #66
I fail to see the humor in another unpunished gun murder Doctor_J May 2012 #68
CBS photo is NRA propaganda? Do you even know who Alan Dershowitz even is? gejohnston May 2012 #69
Next up - NRA member claims SYG defense for shooting Obama t-shirt wearer Doctor_J May 2012 #57
No, these laws are gejohnston May 2012 #61
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Shooters in Summer Moody ...»Reply #29