Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: ‘Bullet Button’ Used To Get Around California Gun Laws [View all]ToolMaker
(27 posts)39. are her own words proof enough?
Feinstein said on CBS-TV's 60 Minutes, February 5, 1995, "If I could have gotten 51 votes in the Senate of the United States for an outright ban, picking up every one of them . . . Mr. and Mrs. America, turn 'em all in, I would have done it. I could not do that. The votes weren't here."[22]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_positions_of_Dianne_Feinstein#Gun_politics]
"Banning guns addresses a fundamental right of all Americans to feel safe."
--U.S. Sen. Dianne Feinstein Associated Press 11/18/93
I'm sure there are more if a person wanted to dig through every speech she has made with regard to guns, but I have other things to do right now.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
82 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Would you really want that guy with a concealed weapon standing next to a little girl.
Hoyt
May 2012
#59
What do you know about him besides the fact he has an AK stock made out of a toilet seat?
Glaug-Eldare
May 2012
#61
Well it ain't difficult when some yahoo is standing there with a toilet seat modified rifle.
Hoyt
May 2012
#70
Better him than *this* person with a concealed standing next to a little girl:
friendly_iconoclast
May 2012
#67
Gun crowd is not much different from Wall Streeters, banks and other such groups in that respect.
Hoyt
May 2012
#16
It's not "getting around" the law. Using a bullet button is following the law.
Johnny Rico
May 2012
#26
I'm sorry, we ain't talking tools here. Except for tools of the NRA and other right wing groups.
Hoyt
May 2012
#60
Do you take *any* optional lawful deductions when you fill out tax forms?
friendly_iconoclast
May 2012
#48
So how many bullets do you think you need for self-defense, if that is what you will use gun for?
Hoyt
May 2012
#23
I don't know in advance, which is why it's better to have more rather than less.
Johnny Rico
May 2012
#24
No one ever knows in advance how many shots they'll need to fire in self-defense.
Johnny Rico
May 2012
#31
Exactly so. Given the choice, why would I defend myself with anything less than the most effective
Johnny Rico
May 2012
#33
And as long as we all have the freedom to choose which path to go down, I don't have the slightest
Johnny Rico
May 2012
#41
This is what usually happens when non-technical people attempt to craft a technical fix...
slackmaster
May 2012
#13
Actually it is what happens when you try to appease a bunch of morally bankrupt people.
Hoyt
May 2012
#17
Also what happens when you get people like Hoyt calling up and yammering for gun control...
Atypical Liberal
May 2012
#77
Wow, haven't seen a pseudo-Freudian reference from you lot in a while.
friendly_iconoclast
May 2012
#68