Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Colt Offers Two New California-Legal Carbines [View all]Johnny Rico
(1,438 posts)55. That's rather amusing, given that you didn't address my point.
The firearms in the OP are neither assault weapons or "assault weapons" as defined by California law.
Do you agree or disagree?
Answer the question, and we have a starting point for a conversation. Tap dance around it, and we don't.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
59 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
With all the problems in the world, who needs such a rifle? And, who really cares it's available?
Hoyt
May 2012
#2
Computers aren't guns. Do you consider strutting down the street with a gun a "hobby?"
Hoyt
May 2012
#4
Some people in California appear to need it, otherwise Colt wouldn't be marketing it.
Johnny Rico
May 2012
#5
That's twice you've called firearms that aren't assault rifles "assault rifles".
friendly_iconoclast
May 2012
#47
A firearm is either classified as an AW under California law, or not an AW.
slackmaster
May 2012
#53