Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: State's law of preemption hobbles cities' attempt to address gun violence [View all]hack89
(39,181 posts)56. Of course it is a civil liberty - that is what the BoR delineates.
and no - towns and states cannot limit enumerated civil liberties based on their perception of "public safety" or "community standards" or "tradition". That is the exact logic that gave us the Patriot Act. Groups of people do not have rights. Rights are purely individual and should never be at the mercy of the majority. Would you support a town denying the right of guy people to marry because it does not fit their idea of how "decent" people behave in public? What if a town does not want an abortion clinic - can they ban it?
There should be a single standard and it should be the most permissive - a true progressive should support the expansion of personal liberty over government power.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
68 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
State's law of preemption hobbles cities' attempt to address gun violence [View all]
SecularMotion
Jun 2012
OP
Prohibition doesn't work. House is a metaphor for town, a place people live in.
Starboard Tack
Jun 2012
#25
People who want to engage in any public behavior the town deems unsuitable.
Starboard Tack
Jun 2012
#30
"Towns are collections of houses. Do you want armed strangers walking through your house?"
Nuclear Unicorn
Jun 2012
#68
States without preemption are simply minefields to ensnare average people.
OneTenthofOnePercent
Jun 2012
#3
It would be very simple to exclude interstate corridors from local gun carry laws.
Starboard Tack
Jun 2012
#20
That is what has happened. I thought is was discussed here but may be confused with another
sarisataka
Jun 2012
#57
Seems like it would be easy enough to set up a secure system at the airport.
Starboard Tack
Jun 2012
#61
Sorry, but public safety is a local issue. This is not about civil rights.
Starboard Tack
Jun 2012
#43
Washington Ceasefire apparently doesn't give a shit about truth- see paragraph 7:
friendly_iconoclast
Jun 2012
#12