Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
48. You DO understand the the BoR confers NO rights on citizens (except for the 6th), right?
Tue Jun 12, 2012, 10:25 PM
Jun 2012

It is a list of things the Government CANNOT do to citizens.

1. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

2. A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

3. No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

4. The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

5. No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

6. In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.

7. In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

8. Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

9. The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people. THIS is the one you need to pay attention to... as it says there is no limit to my rights (others retained by the people).

10. The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

It may be called The Bill of Rights, but it's more about what rights the Government DOESN'T have.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Spam deleted by gkhouston (MIR Team) Sandra14 Jun 2012 #1
How rude and impolite can one get... ileus Jun 2012 #2
Speaking as a true gun-toting advocate Hells Liberal Jun 2012 #3
Exactly. "Just just because something is legal, it doesn't mean it's a good idea." Hoyt Jun 2012 #8
So by that logic SGMRTDARMY Jun 2012 #16
I support your right to free speech as well. But, I don't - nor does Constitution - toting rights. Hoyt Jun 2012 #18
RKBA SGMRTDARMY Jun 2012 #20
If in a militia. . . . . . . Hoyt Jun 2012 #28
Phew, good thing I'm in one, then! n/t Glaug-Eldare Jun 2012 #38
Still beating your dog? Tejas Jun 2012 #73
Not really. Lizzie Poppet Jul 2012 #103
I'd suggest you read Stevens' dissent in Heller. It's very different from the right wing twisting Hoyt Jul 2012 #104
Read it when it was issued. Lizzie Poppet Jul 2012 #105
So thats what your calling us now? permatex Jul 2012 #106
Interesting writing sarisataka Jul 2012 #107
That's the cool thing about rights. NewMoonTherian Jun 2012 #27
You DO understand the the BoR confers NO rights on citizens (except for the 6th), right? cherokeeprogressive Jun 2012 #48
Yep, "Well regulated militia," and you ain't in one. Hoyt Jun 2012 #51
Conviently left out the rest of it I see SGMRTDARMY Jun 2012 #53
Go read Justice Stevens dissent. Tell me what makes more sense. Hoyt Jun 2012 #64
"Without all the Constitutional stuff for a moment..." cherokeeprogressive Jun 2012 #65
Thats the beautiful thing about this country SGMRTDARMY Jun 2012 #66
Absolutely. Atypical Liberal Jun 2012 #91
"Well regulated militia" is apropos of nothing. cherokeeprogressive Jun 2012 #57
And according to this reading, Glaug-Eldare Jun 2012 #58
If memory serves correctly, members of the Armed Forces aren't allowed to sue the US Government cherokeeprogressive Jun 2012 #60
"I'm out of soda. I'm going to the store." Atypical Liberal Jun 2012 #90
I pretty much figured you'd forego answering post #57. n/t cherokeeprogressive Jun 2012 #92
Had a chance to Meiko Jul 2012 #100
I wish I could Rec your post a million times. I wish it was pinned at the top of GD. I wish it were Tuesday Afternoon Jun 2012 #88
Michigan is not Kalifornia. Tejas Jun 2012 #74
Bunch of right wing militia types acting normal (ie, stupid). Hoyt Jun 2012 #4
What a bigoted post SGMRTDARMY Jun 2012 #5
Exactly, I'm "bigoted" against right wing militia types who intimidate with guns. Always will be. Hoyt Jun 2012 #6
So you know for a fact that these people SGMRTDARMY Jun 2012 #7
No, since you are making judgements on zero or incomplete data... PavePusher Jun 2012 #10
Better than a racist Minuteman or other militia member intimidating people with their guns. Hoyt Jun 2012 #11
You are the same as them. PavePusher Jun 2012 #23
Agreed, racists such as Malik 'kill cracker babies' Shabazz Tejas Jun 2012 #72
MLK was a RW militia type according to your lunacy. Tejas Jun 2012 #9
MLK had a reason to carry -- right wing racists who rely on guns and bombs to intimidate. Hoyt Jun 2012 #12
So would it have been OK for him to tote a death spewer into Chuck E. Cheese? n/t Glaug-Eldare Jun 2012 #13
Yea, that's right. He's about the only one though. Hoyt Jun 2012 #14
Wrong SGMRTDARMY Jun 2012 #15
I know you can't go without a gun. Hopefully, like cigarettes, the image can become negative. n/t Hoyt Jun 2012 #17
What image SGMRTDARMY Jun 2012 #19
Post removed Post removed Jun 2012 #25
YUP, that's working so well with rapists and murderers. Tejas Jun 2012 #34
About beevul's hidden post... PavePusher Jun 2012 #45
I'm guessing the judges never bothered to listen to the clip gejohnston Jun 2012 #47
Here you go....more drive by jury work... ileus Jun 2012 #49
"the person quoted Holder as saying something tat I do not believe he said." Glaug-Eldare Jun 2012 #50
Some things are beyond amazing....aren't they? ileus Jun 2012 #52
DUzy-worthy.... PavePusher Jun 2012 #55
LOL! Who ya gonna believe? Me, or your lyin' eyes and ears? n/t cherokeeprogressive Jun 2012 #59
Post removed Post removed Jun 2012 #54
what is worse is the one that whined begging to have the poster banned. ileus Jun 2012 #56
I have a pretty good idea who the whiner was SGMRTDARMY Jun 2012 #61
Fuck censorship- here it is again, and he does, in fact call for brainwashing at 0:48 friendly_iconoclast Jun 2012 #63
Lots of Breitbart fans around these parts Son of Gob Jun 2012 #67
How dare Holder not want kids to think it's cool and hip to carry a gun! Son of Gob Jun 2012 #68
So whats RW about it? SGMRTDARMY Jun 2012 #69
Nothing; It's "hurtful" nt ileus Jun 2012 #77
What is wrong with believing it's "not hip to carry a gun?" Sounds like good advice and a smart Hoyt Jun 2012 #78
Nothing wrong with it if its your child SGMRTDARMY Jun 2012 #79
Why is it any government's job to change public opinion about protected activities? Glaug-Eldare Jun 2012 #80
Pretty simple to me -- like cigarettes, pollution, greed, bigotry, etc., guns are bad for society, Hoyt Jun 2012 #81
In your opinion they are SGMRTDARMY Jun 2012 #82
Well parents are doing a crummy job in this instance. Hoyt Jun 2012 #86
Thats your opinion SGMRTDARMY Jun 2012 #87
Those examples aren't constitutionally protected, Glaug-Eldare Jun 2012 #83
Was the C-Span clip edited or faked? gejohnston Jun 2012 #71
If that is what Holder said, I agree 100%. However, don't agree with hiding posts. Hoyt Jun 2012 #76
so you are saying it was taken out of context? gejohnston Jun 2012 #84
It's pretty clear to me what he is talking about -- could have come from Bill Cosby. Hoyt Jun 2012 #85
Then I have a reason to carry also, that is, unless Tejas Jun 2012 #70
What the hell are these people thinking delgreco Jun 2012 #21
Kinda like carrying around Skittles and iced tea, Glaug-Eldare Jun 2012 #22
"disturbing the peace"? PavePusher Jun 2012 #30
A light Fisking.... PavePusher Jun 2012 #24
That may be so Glaug-Eldare Jun 2012 #26
Has nothing to do with Baghdad. PavePusher Jun 2012 #29
Quite correct sarisataka Jun 2012 #32
she could have gejohnston Jun 2012 #37
Oh my god. Glaug-Eldare Jun 2012 #39
Not yet... PavePusher Jun 2012 #42
I really don't understand why you'd be supportive of this kind of carry. Glaug-Eldare Jun 2012 #40
Respectfully, you are making the mistake of a false equivalance. PavePusher Jun 2012 #43
I'll defer to your greater knowledge of rifle carry, Glaug-Eldare Jun 2012 #46
Here's the issue: PavePusher Jun 2012 #62
Only folks saying it's not intimidation are those who can't envision life w/o gun in their pants. Hoyt Jun 2012 #31
It is intimidation, pure and simple. First cousin to bullying. kestrel91316 Jun 2012 #33
intimidate whom? gejohnston Jun 2012 #35
Like mall ninjas with their 87 velcro-attached accesories? Tejas Jun 2012 #75
Better to be a member of SWAT with a FULL-AUTO rifle Tejas Jun 2012 #36
In case you missed it SGMRTDARMY Jun 2012 #41
welcome to DU. Have a Nice Day. Tuesday Afternoon Jun 2012 #44
cross posting for Transparency Tuesday Afternoon Jun 2012 #89
I'd like to shake juror #5's hand... then tell him/her the handshake never happened. cherokeeprogressive Jun 2012 #93
I bet Juror #5 is someone's sock or a zombie. and thanks again Tuesday Afternoon Jun 2012 #94
Only problem I have with open display is that when the police are called... L0oniX Jun 2012 #95
I had an amusing LEO encounter at a Chick-fil-A this year Glaug-Eldare Jun 2012 #96
I suppose that depends on your location mvccd1000 Jun 2012 #97
**UPDATE** - 'Brandishing' or 'carrying'? Court will weigh teen's gun charge arrest mvccd1000 Jun 2012 #98
**UPDATE** - Teen acquitted in Birmingham gun incident mvccd1000 Jul 2012 #99
Victory for this brave young man, society and the 2A ileus Jul 2012 #101
Correct verdict permatex Jul 2012 #102
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»"Gun-toting advocate...»Reply #48