Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Christmas gun ads from the past [View all]Atypical Liberal
(5,412 posts)Reductio ad absurdum (Latin: "reduction to the absurd"
is a form of argument in which a proposition is disproven by following its implications logically to an absurd consequence.
This has nothing to do with understanding why a man with 200 guns is more dangerous than a man with only 1 gun.
I have asked you countless times how a man with 200 guns is somehow dangerous enough that it would warrant restricting the number of firearms a person can own. You've come up with nothing.
No matter how many guns a man owns, he can only use maybe 2 of them at a time. There's no harm in a person owning dozens, or even hundreds of firearms because he can't possibly use them all to commit a crime.
Now you might say that someone with a lot of guns might be a target for theft. True, but so what? Are you saying we should restrict the rights of law-abiding people because someone might commit a crime against them?!?!
That's ridiculous.