Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: "Legally allowing women to shoot their rapists only encourages murders." [View all]caseymoz
(5,763 posts)44. You are misinformed.
Because that has always been the criteria for filing charges-- for anything.
You think they have the right to file charges without evidence?
You probably haven't seen this part of SYG because it's actually in a different statute Florida statute, but one altered by the same SYG bill to accommodate the main law:
(1) A person who uses force as permitted in s. 776.012, s. 776.013, or s. 776.031 is justified in using such force and is immune from criminal prosecution and civil action for the use of such force... (2) A law enforcement agency may use standard procedures for investigating the use of force as described in subsection (1), but the agency may not arrest the person for using force unless it determines that there is probable cause that the force that was used was unlawful.
It makes people immune from arrest or prosecution if it's determined that it was self-defense. Or that's apparently the way some police departments have been interpreting it.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
67 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"Legally allowing women to shoot their rapists only encourages murders." [View all]
Nuclear Unicorn
Jun 2012
OP
SYG adds nothing new except the would-be victim is not required to retreat
Nuclear Unicorn
Jun 2012
#4
I wasn't commenting on the rightness or wrongness of privately owned prisons
Nuclear Unicorn
Jun 2012
#42
You are the one who is not thinking and is seriously confused about SD and SYG
ProgressiveProfessor
Jun 2012
#67
Saying something is demonstrably false and then providing an example is insulting?
Nuclear Unicorn
Jun 2012
#20
Arrest and trial ARE punishment, if one hasn't actually done something wrong.
PavePusher
Jun 2012
#24
"Idiot"? Not at all. "Confused", maybe. Or possibly, by your own admission, "misleading".
PavePusher
Jun 2012
#60