Mich Court of Appeals: Open Carry Protected, Stun Gun Ban Void

[sarisataka]

7. Excellent point

Even though I am very much in the pro-firearms camp, I am aware many (the majority?) of people has no business carrying a firearm for protection. Reason being they would never actually bring themselves to use it in their defense.
For those people a less-lethal SD option is just the ticket. They are more likely to use it, less-lethal weapons are almost as effective as many firearms- and looking at it from a very callous viewpoint, if the person is overcome by their attacker the criminal did not just gain access to a gun.