Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

PavePusher

(15,374 posts)
102. Somehow, I doubt the entire state is represented by a single man.
Sun Jan 1, 2012, 12:42 PM
Jan 2012

You really need to take your bigotry and stereotyping and go fuck yourself with it. It's vile, puerile, indicative of a lack of rationality and facts, and wouldn't be tolerated in any other forum here.

I don't think Obama would veto anything that had anti-gun language in it... krispos42 Dec 2011 #1
None of those issues would safeinOhio Dec 2011 #2
In your viewpoint... krispos42 Dec 2011 #5
True in my viewpoint. safeinOhio Dec 2011 #7
What other Constitutional Rights are "states rights" issues? PavePusher Dec 2011 #13
I , and most others, safeinOhio Dec 2011 #16
SCOTUS has declared that "keep" is a fundamental Right. PavePusher Dec 2011 #19
"would seem to indicate" safeinOhio Dec 2011 #26
You are arguing something I haven't even asserted. PavePusher Dec 2011 #27
Every day is a good day, here. safeinOhio Dec 2011 #43
Fundamental does not mean absolute. PavePusher Dec 2011 #46
Where do you get from the decision that 'keep' is unregulated? X_Digger Dec 2011 #44
The examples you have given here pipoman Dec 2011 #74
The AWB was NOT a ban. It was a merely "feel good" law... spin Dec 2011 #18
IMHO I think the gun mania of this country... ellisonz Dec 2011 #52
No, it made manufacturers change features or model names.. X_Digger Dec 2011 #55
What do you think that says about the integrity of the gun manufacturers? ellisonz Dec 2011 #57
I guess it says the gun manufacturers are burf Dec 2011 #58
They met the letter of the law. A boneheaded law. X_Digger Dec 2011 #62
You have very low expectations for corporate responsibility. n/t ellisonz Dec 2011 #63
Well isn't that special.. X_Digger Dec 2011 #68
A company should respect the intention of the Federal government... ellisonz Dec 2011 #72
I'm endorsing following the law as written X_Digger Dec 2011 #76
If the intent was to have companies stop manufacturing semi-auto firearms.... PavePusher Jan 2012 #103
Read further down the article you linked to... spin Dec 2011 #61
Thats because the arms manufacturers are snakes... ellisonz Dec 2011 #65
Virtually every law and restriction pipoman Dec 2011 #75
No it doesn't irk me in the least... spin Dec 2011 #84
And this is a good thing? ellisonz Dec 2011 #87
"damn things wouldn't be in production" -- did you forget? Production never stopped. X_Digger Dec 2011 #88
You certainly are upset with people for complying with the law. PavePusher Dec 2011 #90
The AWB was concieved and passed during a moral panic. friendly_iconoclast Dec 2011 #93
The War on Terror has contributed far more to a militarized police force... spin Dec 2011 #91
Still insist on following Josh Sugarmann's failed line? friendly_iconoclast Dec 2011 #92
Italian proverb: Simo 1939_1940 Jan 2012 #105
I think Bloomberg is jealous and a whiney fuck of an Authoritarian. PavePusher Dec 2011 #3
All bets are off. safeinOhio Dec 2011 #8
Did I say I thought anyone would try to take away guns? PavePusher Dec 2011 #12
You are the one that said safeinOhio Dec 2011 #17
I don't believe in conspiracies rl6214 Dec 2011 #4
Their power could be curtailed in the blink of an eye slackmaster Dec 2011 #6
Precisely. It's the only issue I can think of where the party is horrifically out of step with Fair Witness Dec 2011 #9
You are welcome to your own opinion but not your own facts safeinOhio Dec 2011 #29
That is a horse-shit poll and I think you know why. Fair Witness Dec 2011 #33
Like I said, safeinOhio Dec 2011 #36
This one (from your own link) shows a drastic DECLINE in support of more 'control' Fair Witness Dec 2011 #39
Yup , safeinOhio Dec 2011 #41
the question I always had about this poll is gejohnston Dec 2011 #50
Polls of gun owners show that a majority of them safeinOhio Dec 2011 #73
most of us expressed the same here gejohnston Dec 2011 #77
"Confusion to the enemy!...." SteveW Dec 2011 #79
What I REALLY want to know is Glassunion Dec 2011 #10
Would you settle for Eric Estrada? slackmaster Dec 2011 #11
As a Democrat and NRA member I hate the over-the-top language from LaPierre and most of the NRA. aikoaiko Dec 2011 #14
If Obama comes out for rrneck Dec 2011 #15
I partially agree... ToolMaker Dec 2011 #21
Who said he was against... ellisonz Dec 2011 #53
Who said he was against... rrneck Dec 2011 #54
Well much of the rhetoric here that is so popular out there... ellisonz Dec 2011 #59
and a third can't name any... rrneck Dec 2011 #64
Definitely not political cartoons... ellisonz Dec 2011 #67
It's about as good as it's going to get right now. nt rrneck Dec 2011 #69
how is this remotely relevant? gejohnston Dec 2011 #70
How is it not relevant? n/t ellisonz Dec 2011 #71
I fail to see how gejohnston Dec 2011 #78
"Perhaps it was more of a written by the dim for the clueless." ellisonz Dec 2011 #83
Please, enlighten us of the loopholes of which you speak. n/t oneshooter Dec 2011 #85
It's not hard to write such legislation... ellisonz Dec 2011 #86
Keep those NRA royalties rollin' in! nt SteveW Dec 2011 #80
$650 for a toaster???? WTF Remmah2 Dec 2011 #20
An "assault" or "tactical" toaster would go for $1500 and sell in the millions. Hoyt Dec 2011 #22
No, because that would be stupid. Callisto32 Dec 2011 #24
Grenade launcher, assault toast thrower, it's all the same to him. PavePusher Dec 2011 #28
Just like the guns that folks seem to covet for some irrational reason. Hoyt Dec 2011 #30
More like the firearms you have a irrational fear of, for no reason. n/t oneshooter Dec 2011 #45
We've given you plenty of rational reasons. PavePusher Dec 2011 #47
Maybe not, burf Dec 2011 #60
compared to Brady and VPC gejohnston Dec 2011 #23
Hope that never happens. Guns in public is a regressive cause, no matter how many votes it attracts. Hoyt Dec 2011 #31
hope what never happens? gejohnston Dec 2011 #35
Gun-control must be a "conservative cause." It's worked so well for the Right! nt SteveW Dec 2011 #81
This message was self-deleted by its author Simo 1939_1940 Dec 2011 #94
I think you'd like seeing the bumper of my car. Simo 1939_1940 Dec 2011 #95
Where I'm from, you usually see confederate flag, "insured by S&W," W, and NRA sticker on vehicles. Hoyt Dec 2011 #98
Glad I'm not from Georgia gejohnston Dec 2011 #99
Dick Cheney country? Hoyt Jan 2012 #101
Somehow, I doubt the entire state is represented by a single man. PavePusher Jan 2012 #102
it is also gejohnston Jan 2012 #104
We sure are lucky the Colonists didn't have any guns, otherwise we might have our own country Fair Witness Dec 2011 #37
"Guns in public is a regressive cause..........." Simo 1939_1940 Dec 2011 #97
The NRA is a bunch of right wing idiots. Who will lie to raise money. Hate them. Logical Dec 2011 #25
I recently joined, not because I think LaPierre is a good guy, but because I'm interested in protect Fair Witness Dec 2011 #34
I think you are supporting a right wing group. Like if you joined pro-life group or Logical Dec 2011 #38
Yes, it is my decision. Fair Witness Dec 2011 #40
?? What does this have to do with the NRA...... Logical Dec 2011 #42
Sooooo, let's turn into a more centrist group. By joining. PavePusher Dec 2011 #48
I don't think it would work. The NRA would lose too many members if they started.... Logical Dec 2011 #49
maybe gejohnston Dec 2011 #51
Correct. The NRA is not about inclusiveness. ellisonz Dec 2011 #56
Only 1/2 royalty payment for this one... SteveW Dec 2011 #82
Stereotyping. Broad-brushing. Pigeon-holing. PavePusher Dec 2011 #89
Notice that the latest scary buzz terminology Simo 1939_1940 Dec 2011 #96
I think how the NRA spends its money speaks for itself. n/t ellisonz Jan 2012 #100
I think LaPierre is fearmongering to raise revenue. AtheistCrusader Dec 2011 #32
I would bet... discntnt_irny_srcsm Dec 2011 #66
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»NRA Raises $200 Million a...»Reply #102