Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Where do you stand on banning guns? [View all]Trunk Monkey
(950 posts)56. I am talking about actual state sponsored militias such as the Texas State Guard
http://www.txsg.state.tx.us/
Or the Alaska territorial guard which actually saw combat in WWII
http://atg.alaska.gov/
And is now known as the Alaska State Defense force
http://dmva.alaska.gov/asdf/
Not the Montana Freemen or the Michigan Militia
Yes, but I would drop the 200 dollar tax and make the applicant pay for the background check.
I believe this would place an undue burden on the applicant.
Or the Alaska territorial guard which actually saw combat in WWII
http://atg.alaska.gov/
And is now known as the Alaska State Defense force
http://dmva.alaska.gov/asdf/
Not the Montana Freemen or the Michigan Militia
Back to my first point. You said bring back the NFA Registry. I think that is allowing all class 2 weapons but requiring them to be registered after only extensive background checks.
Yes, but I would drop the 200 dollar tax and make the applicant pay for the background check.
If this would require annual renewals and extensive training I can't say I would have a problem with this.
I believe this would place an undue burden on the applicant.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
130 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Wow you just rendered both your vote AND your opinion totally meaningless and irrelevent.
cherokeeprogressive
Jul 2012
#31
How does that differ from the third choice? Isn't the National Guard the military, and aren't they
TPaine7
Jul 2012
#6
How did the NRA mislead the Supreme Court in the 1800s and the Framers of the 14th Amendment?
TPaine7
Jul 2012
#12
DU Member Francis Marion had this to say about the meaning of a weel regulated militia
Trunk Monkey
Jul 2012
#7
Good idea. Allowing honest citizens to legally carry concealed makes for a dangerous ...
spin
Jul 2012
#66
someone interpreting an OC as such a sign sounds fearful and paranoid to me.
gejohnston
Jul 2012
#88
Reopen the NFA registry, and remove SBRs, SBSs, and silencers from the Act. No AWB.
petronius
Jul 2012
#11
Would it surprise you to know that the militia HAS been called out as late as 1942?
Trunk Monkey
Jul 2012
#25
I am talking about actual state sponsored militias such as the Texas State Guard
Trunk Monkey
Jul 2012
#56
You make an interesting point about the implementation of the 2nd, I think it would be very odd
pop topcan
Dec 2012
#106
I wouldn't call limiting ownership of semi-auto assault style rifles to the police and the military
spin
Jul 2012
#42
Almost impossible to carry in public. Severe restrictions on guns manufactured as "assault/tactical"
Hoyt
Jul 2012
#51
Return to intent, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed
TheKentuckian
Jul 2012
#62
Federal government has no constitutional authority to ban arms. SCOTUS said "the Second Amendment,
jody
Jul 2012
#78
One quick question, do you consider double action revolvers to be semi-automatic?
pop topcan
Dec 2012
#108
The capacity of a semi-auto is dependent on the size of the magazine in the weapon. ...
spin
Dec 2012
#109