Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Guns in Public, and Out of Sight [View all]Atypical Liberal
(5,412 posts)180. I think you are stretching.
"That's why police officers carry firearms."
In this country. Where I grew up and worked as one they don't carry firearms and it works very well for them. Just to let you know there is always another side to the coin.
The bottom line is when police officers are threatened with real violence they almost always show up with guns.
Did you watch the video of the guy taking the AK47 away from the would be robber and laughing as he did it. Do you think that guy was a victim or sees himself as a victim? I don't.
The man was a victim of armed robbery. The fact that he was able to engage in a successful attempt to physically overpower his attacker does not change that fact.
When one arms oneself to walk out of the house one has already decided to be a potential victim. I find that very sad.
When I drive out of my driveway with a spare tire, this does not mean I have already decided to have a flat tire. It simply means that I want to be prepared if I do have a flat tire.
Carrying a gun means that I have decided to be able to fight back if I ever am a victim of violent crime.
I never found using Judo techniques as physical resistance. They are the opposite. I think you have a very poor understanding of how Judo works. Efficiency is about accomplishing a task with the least effort. Shooting someone requires an enormous effort.
This is a huge stretch. You're just simply wrong. If you are using your body to manipulate someone else's body in a combat situation, then that is hand to hand combat. That is physical resistance - you are physically using your body to manipulate your attacker's body to resist their attack. There is simply no comparison between the amount of physical effort (and that is what we are talking about here when we talk about physical contests of strength) to engage in hand to hand combat versus that required to fire a handgun .
Again, I have a very good understanding of how Judo works, and Hapkido in particular. This does not change the fact that any martial art is hand to hand combat, and requires the user to be physically capable of using their body to deflect the attack of their attacker's body. While there are indeed some cute moves that people can use to incapacitate an attacker with almost trivial body movements, as my instructor taught us most fights end up on the ground in a desperate, violent physical encounter. Physical strength and training are huge[i/] parts of winning nearly any violent encounter.
In this country. Where I grew up and worked as one they don't carry firearms and it works very well for them. Just to let you know there is always another side to the coin.
The bottom line is when police officers are threatened with real violence they almost always show up with guns.
Did you watch the video of the guy taking the AK47 away from the would be robber and laughing as he did it. Do you think that guy was a victim or sees himself as a victim? I don't.
The man was a victim of armed robbery. The fact that he was able to engage in a successful attempt to physically overpower his attacker does not change that fact.
When one arms oneself to walk out of the house one has already decided to be a potential victim. I find that very sad.
When I drive out of my driveway with a spare tire, this does not mean I have already decided to have a flat tire. It simply means that I want to be prepared if I do have a flat tire.
Carrying a gun means that I have decided to be able to fight back if I ever am a victim of violent crime.
I never found using Judo techniques as physical resistance. They are the opposite. I think you have a very poor understanding of how Judo works. Efficiency is about accomplishing a task with the least effort. Shooting someone requires an enormous effort.
This is a huge stretch. You're just simply wrong. If you are using your body to manipulate someone else's body in a combat situation, then that is hand to hand combat. That is physical resistance - you are physically using your body to manipulate your attacker's body to resist their attack. There is simply no comparison between the amount of physical effort (and that is what we are talking about here when we talk about physical contests of strength) to engage in hand to hand combat versus that required to fire a handgun .
Again, I have a very good understanding of how Judo works, and Hapkido in particular. This does not change the fact that any martial art is hand to hand combat, and requires the user to be physically capable of using their body to deflect the attack of their attacker's body. While there are indeed some cute moves that people can use to incapacitate an attacker with almost trivial body movements, as my instructor taught us most fights end up on the ground in a desperate, violent physical encounter. Physical strength and training are huge[i/] parts of winning nearly any violent encounter.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
187 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
So refreshing and reassuring to know only the good guys carry guns, isn't it?
Starboard Tack
Dec 2011
#1
No, it's refreshing to know that not ONLY the bad guys can carry guns.
Atypical Liberal
Dec 2011
#23
Studied some Judo at police college and later I did some Karate training. No belts or special PJs.
Starboard Tack
Dec 2011
#55
Training for a black belt is difficult. Takes dedication, determination and time.
Starboard Tack
Dec 2011
#80
No bullshit, I'm relating real life experience. Nothing Hollywood about it. No contradictions.
Starboard Tack
Dec 2011
#86
I'm not denying that a gun is more effective than a martial art. So is a bomb.
Starboard Tack
Dec 2011
#58
He said "Then there are likely situations where a gun is the best answer"
Starboard Tack
Dec 2011
#81
I don't want to disarm anyone, not even the criminals. I definitely don't want to discuss your guns.
Starboard Tack
Dec 2011
#109
But since those people who legally carry in public represent no real threat to you
hack89
Dec 2011
#110
And that script will probably continue to be played out. Nothing new about your response.
Starboard Tack
Jan 2012
#136
Sanity is also not about repeating an unproven assertion, in the hopes it becomes accepted truth.
beevul
Jan 2012
#151
Again with the silly "guns are designed to injure or kill humans"...........
Simo 1939_1940
Jan 2012
#129
It's so refreshing and reassuring to know only the good guys use laptops, isn't it?
SteveW
Dec 2011
#30
I don't want to expand NICS or any other testing, except individual reality testing
Starboard Tack
Dec 2011
#38
Why don't you want to expand NICS? What were Bloomie's whiny videos about if not that?
friendly_iconoclast
Dec 2011
#42
Then DO something. Support President Obama's proposals, for starters:
friendly_iconoclast
Jan 2012
#125
Can't help it- I took your claim to want effective gun control at face value.
friendly_iconoclast
Jan 2012
#138
Individuals make the choice - as long as government doesn't get in the way.
Atypical Liberal
Dec 2011
#56
"What makes you so special that these violent criminal pose a threat to you."
Simo 1939_1940
Jan 2012
#144
The number of guns in the US has risen, while gun violence has declined.
friendly_iconoclast
Jan 2012
#184
Really good argument for more user fees to pay for background checks and record maintenance...
ellisonz
Dec 2011
#6
So we should have fees required to carry a book or speak in public, and to vote.
PavePusher
Dec 2011
#20
Or a good argument for just doing away with the requirement altogether.
Atypical Liberal
Dec 2011
#28
Sounds like N.C. may have a communication problem between law enforcement....
PavePusher
Dec 2011
#7
The article admits that there are crimes prevented by those who legally carry concealed...
spin
Dec 2011
#9
Hard for NYT "to track [gun self-defense] episodes." Esp. if they neither try...
SteveW
Dec 2011
#65