Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: If owning a gun is a right, should guns be subsidized for the low income? [View all]arendt
(5,078 posts)1. I diaried this at Kos a few weeks ago
Let them eat lead
Not much comment there; but I will love to see the reaction from the Gungeon.
Ducking and covering.
Last summer, the conservative Heritage Foundation tried to argue that if you own a microwave oven, you are not poor. This disingenuous argument was made to support even more vicious means testing to prevent poor people from getting any assistance. People pointed out that a microwave can be purchased for as little as $30, i.e., for less than a bottle of good gin.
With that in mind, let's go over the economics of gun ownership.
From what I have learned over the past few days, ammo costs about $0.25 per round; and bulk discounts kick in at 1,000 rounds or $250. Some posters on boards I frequent have said they regularly go through 1,000 or more rounds per week in target shooting. Right there, you are talking about spending $1,000 month on your hobby. That is almost a month's wages for someone making minimum wage.
Now, of course, if you are going to shoot that much, you want a decent gun. Again, from the last two days, I gather that Glocks cost about $500; and 100 round drum magazines cost about $100. I did not see a number for an AR-15; but I'm going to guess its in the same price range.
So, the buy in to be minimally armed for vigilante combat is $750 - $500 for the gun and $250 for some bullets. I'm not even counting the costs of going to a gun range or paying for licenses. Order of magnitude, for a person at the poverty line, that is about one month's disposable income. But, for the sake of argument, let's assume that some poor person can afford to do this.
Can you imagine the outcry from the likes of the Heritage Foundation when that well-armed poor person runs afoul of the law in some "stand your ground" situation? The slander will start with the financial irresponsibility or criminal intent of such a purchase by such a person. It really does matter who does the shooting.
Not much comment there; but I will love to see the reaction from the Gungeon.
Ducking and covering.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
70 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If owning a gun is a right, should guns be subsidized for the low income? [View all]
Kaleva
Aug 2012
OP
The district court of DC, a majority opinion by the fascist Scalia, and that crumb Rehnquist
arendt
Aug 2012
#58
I'm willing to bet your "lack of controls and common sense" don't match up with mine.
shadowrider
Aug 2012
#55
I can't afford cable or satellite. Netflix at $7.99 a month is the best I can do.
Kaleva
Aug 2012
#9
It's already been done - the Arm the Homeless campaign. Results were hilarious.
slackmaster
Aug 2012
#26
The right to own something doesn't mean a right to have someone else pay for it
slackmaster
Aug 2012
#25