Gun Control & RKBA

gejohnston

(17,502 posts)

5. because they didn't prove he sold the gun

Mon Aug 13, 2012, 02:48 PM

Aug 2012

IIRC, Coxe's story is that the clerk left Coday alone with the weapon unsecure. Coday walked left $200 on the counter and walked out with the gun. If true, that clerk should not still be there.

Ripping off a gun store is like robbing a bank, both federal crimes. Was Coday charged or convicted of stealing the gun?
Did the ATF sanction Coxe lack luster inventory control? I heard of FFLs losing their license for less.
If the answers are yes/no, then the judge was correct
If the answers are no/yes, then his decision was not correct.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

14 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Brady Center Leads Challenge to Arms Act that Protects Firearms Industry [View all] jpak Aug 2012 OP

du rec. nt xchrom Aug 2012 #1

As I understand it gejohnston Aug 2012 #2

Tell it to the judge SecularMotion Aug 2012 #3

because they didn't prove he sold the gun gejohnston Aug 2012 #5

That story is very sketchy SecularMotion Aug 2012 #7

pretty sketchy perhaps gejohnston Aug 2012 #9

re: "...the Brady Campaign is wasting their time..." discntnt_irny_srcsm Aug 2012 #4

"...he knowingly allowed Coday to pay for the gun without first getting a background check." slackmaster Aug 2012 #6

I don't know where you are but BigAlanMac Aug 2012 #11

I'm in California. The paperwork and background check amount to about 20-30 minutes of hassle. slackmaster Aug 2012 #13

For the last 15 years it has taken me 10min. to complete the purchase oneshooter Aug 2012 #14

Wait a second Missycim Aug 2012 #8

Easy... discntnt_irny_srcsm Aug 2012 #10

I see a beautiful ant-gun effort about to fail. aikoaiko Aug 2012 #12