Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: I think guns carried in public should be virtually incapable of firing when dropped. Do you agree? [View all]TPaine7
(4,286 posts)37. Perhaps you're being a little hard on gordianot
Star Member gordianot (5,714 posts)
6. Of greater concern carry a firearm in public what are you going to do if someone tries to take it?
View profile
Publicly displayed firearms are an invitation and places you and others in danger. This is my opinion I have several firearms. I am not citing statistics. I do not want to take firearms away from others. To the point approach all firearms as if they may discharge. When I see people who carry firearms in public it makes me uneasy not that they will have an accidental discharge but that someone will put that person in a position they will have to protect themselves and their firearms
This is my obervation and opinion.
6. Of greater concern carry a firearm in public what are you going to do if someone tries to take it?
View profile
Publicly displayed firearms are an invitation and places you and others in danger. This is my opinion I have several firearms. I am not citing statistics. I do not want to take firearms away from others. To the point approach all firearms as if they may discharge. When I see people who carry firearms in public it makes me uneasy not that they will have an accidental discharge but that someone will put that person in a position they will have to protect themselves and their firearms
This is my obervation and opinion.
I see two admissions that this is an opinion, an admission that gordianot is not supporting that opinion with statistics and no prescribed solution for society at large.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
61 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I think guns carried in public should be virtually incapable of firing when dropped. Do you agree? [View all]
TPaine7
Aug 2012
OP
Liability insurance has pretty done that already for those being manufactured today
ProgressiveProfessor
Aug 2012
#3
Like most of those with technical backgrounds, I tend to want data and lots of it
ProgressiveProfessor
Aug 2012
#7
Of greater concern carry a firearm in public what are you going to do if someone tries to take it?
gordianot
Aug 2012
#6
Is it my perception or are you truly antagonistic toward people that don't share your worldview?
Trunk Monkey
Aug 2012
#54
I agree, but it's not deadly enough for those who are into packing in public and all things guns.
Hoyt
Aug 2012
#15
If I am fumbling with loading, I don't have as much concentration for evaluation.
Callisto32
Aug 2012
#20
Another factor with the Glock is that it is easy to change the trigger pull weight ...
spin
Aug 2012
#30
I think it's a good idea. California has a pretty strict drop test for ALL new handguns sold here.
slackmaster
Aug 2012
#39