Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Glaug-Eldare

(1,089 posts)
12. Unfortunately, it's a delicate situation for volunteers.
Sat Aug 18, 2012, 04:15 PM
Aug 2012

I'd love to give you a page of biographies, but our situation doesn't lend itself to it. It's an all-volunteer group, and most of the leadership prefers to keep their activism (in person and online) separate from their professional lives. Some members are in law enforcement, state government, public schools, law practice, or other fields where opposing the administration's policies can have negative consequences. Some are just private people who are concerned about being harassed or embarrassed in their personal lives by those who disagree with us. Others simply prefer to remain "part of the crowd" without drawing attention specifically to themselves. There are probably a few who would happily reveal their identities and discuss their history, but I'm not sure which ones they are, and I'd rather not blab on their behalf.

I'm sure this answer doesn't satisfy you, but it's the truest one I can give you while respecting my neighbors' privacy. Maybe sometime down the road, we'll be mainstream enough in MD that we won't perceive any negative consequences to "coming out" as 2A activists. As for me, I just don't like giving PII out on public forums.

You've got a good point, though, and it's something I might bring up with the leadership. Our last President definitely wasn't bashful, and it may have helped to have a defined HMFIC. It's nice to know where the buck stops.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Wonder what other right they'd like to approve of before you can use it? ileus Aug 2012 #1
Maybe Marylanders are too stupid to know that the 2nd Amendment IS Tuesday Afternoon Aug 2012 #2
Says who, but those addicted to guns? Hoyt Aug 2012 #4
whatever. Tuesday Afternoon Aug 2012 #5
Says who indeed. rrneck Aug 2012 #7
if he had any sense he would be headed to SC and taking up bwb on that bet Tuesday Afternoon Aug 2012 #8
Just another keyboard commando with an axe to grind rrneck Aug 2012 #9
Since you own guns (illegally) I guess you are addicted to guns rl6214 Aug 2012 #14
Don't own any illegally, or carry them, or care to add to the few I have from my dad. Hoyt Aug 2012 #20
A quote from you: "As a former robber, I locked the door to keep people out, especially police." rl6214 Aug 2012 #22
Read the posts before that. Used FFL and used money to help my mom. Hoyt Aug 2012 #24
When you used that FFL Union Scribe Aug 2012 #25
Getting told by an admitted robber and arms dealer that *other people's* guns are bad- Priceless! friendly_iconoclast Aug 2012 #30
Got it. Arms dealing is acceptable when YOU need the money. friendly_iconoclast Aug 2012 #29
Would only be illegal if PD Turk Aug 2012 #27
"Might as well face it, they're addicted to guns" villager Aug 2012 #28
Join Maryland Shall Issue and make this ancient history. Glaug-Eldare Aug 2012 #3
Do you have a list of leadership? - always get a kick out of reviewing the folks who lead these type Hoyt Aug 2012 #6
and away he goes with the goalposts again......... Ashgrey77 Aug 2012 #10
Do you have a list, or just more gun cultist BS? Hoyt Aug 2012 #11
And that has what to do with the OP? Ashgrey77 Aug 2012 #15
Guns are not a civil right, but it's like trying to convince Tbaggers otherwise. Hoyt Aug 2012 #17
Amen brother. It is an illusory "right." Loudly Aug 2012 #26
Huh? Which are which? PavePusher Aug 2012 #32
Rest assured. Loudly Aug 2012 #34
Translation: You have no answer. PavePusher Aug 2012 #35
Your answer is that punishment of the murderer is enough of a response. Loudly Aug 2012 #36
How about prevention of all criminal violence? PavePusher Aug 2012 #37
What percentage of the homicides were committed using a gun? Loudly Aug 2012 #38
Let's do a top 10, Ashgrey77 Aug 2012 #33
Thank you. That took work. Loudly Aug 2012 #39
Unfortunately, it's a delicate situation for volunteers. Glaug-Eldare Aug 2012 #12
He just wants a list of names so he can move those goalposts again, Ashgrey77 Aug 2012 #16
I bet they don't want their names released. Right wing gun organization probably doesn't Hoyt Aug 2012 #18
Can't say I didn't know what the answer would be Glaug-Eldare Aug 2012 #21
"Have you considered the possibility that post #12 was written earnestly, and not merely as a cover" rl6214 Aug 2012 #23
I see you still haven't grasped that the people you don't like have the same rights you do. friendly_iconoclast Aug 2012 #31
Are we all to assume you oppose this move rl6214 Aug 2012 #13
Post removed Post removed Aug 2012 #19
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Federal Appeals Court Rei...»Reply #12