Harvard Study: Gun Control is counter productive

[DanTex]

46. And why is it garbage science? Because you disagree with it?

Usually if something is "garbage", that's because it's actually flawed in some way. For example, the study you posted used false data. But the only problem with the studies I cited is that they disagree with your politics.

Also, the Gerry Falwell stuff doesn't get through peer review. Like the Kates study from the OP, it ends up in a non-peer-reviewed journal with a politically biased editorial board. But it's good to see that yet another gun nut has decided to rail against peer review -- it's basically a concession that the actual scientific research doesn't support your point of view, and so you have to resort to conspiracy theories and junk science like the Kates-Mauser study.