Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Canada bans .22 rifle because it looks similar to an AK-47 [View all]iverglas
(38,549 posts)6. ah, my little hometown newspaper
Glad to see it featuring so prominently in, er, the international press ... or wherever you dredged that up from. How did it enter your field of vision, just out of interest? Ah ... reddit ...
How would you feel about an actual primary source, one that tells you facts instead of things like
According to the letter, the decision was made because the AP80 is cosmetically similar to the AK-47 rifle.
http://firearmslaw.ca/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/AP-80-Revocation-notice.pdf
Well, a secondary-source copy of the original, which I couldn't find at a quick search of the firearms program site. Sorry I can't copy that photocopy here. It states that the item in question is a "variant of the design of the firearm commony known as the AK47 rifle". Now, that comes from the definition of the class of prohibited weapons in the relevant regulations.
This decision was not actually made by "the feds". It was made by a court.
http://canlii.ca/en/on/onca/doc/2011/2011onca696/2011onca696.html
This Order in Council prescribes in its Schedule firearms that are prohibited for the purposes of the Criminal Code. Section 64 of the Schedule prescribes the AK-47 rifle and any variant or modified version of it, including the Mitchell AK-22. In other words, the Governor General in Council has declared the AK-22 to be a variant of the AK-47. If, as is clear, the legislative intent is that the AK-22 is a variant of the AK-47, the same must be true of a weapon which is the same as the AK-22, namely the AP80. The correct interpretation of the Order in Council is therefore that the AP80 is a variant of the AK-47. In finding otherwise, the Provincial Court erred in law.
There ya go. Now you have something of actual substance to pick over.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
101 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I'd like to apologize to Canada for the rampant anti-Canadianism that is perpetuated in this country
ellisonz
Jan 2012
#98
That's right, the courts are absolutly correct and absolutely absolute in their decisions.
Remmah2
Jan 2012
#9
passive agressive behavior tends to bring that out in people that are paying attention.
Tuesday Afternoon
Jan 2012
#87
Great example of legislation by fiat. The GG says it's so, therefore it's so.
slackmaster
Jan 2012
#23
Canada has a more sensible approach to guns and health care than we do. In fact, most countries do.
Hoyt
Jan 2012
#16
perhaps, America should follow suit and make entry to our country more restrictive
Tuesday Afternoon
Jan 2012
#65
Now, now- don't you know that's only for more "progressive" nations?
friendly_iconoclast
Jan 2012
#68
criticizing it is one thing...threatening to leave it is another thing entirely.
Tuesday Afternoon
Jan 2012
#66
But if one *is* familiar with guns, the Valmets are clearly AK derivatives...
friendly_iconoclast
Jan 2012
#48