Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Canada bans .22 rifle because it looks similar to an AK-47 [View all]iverglas
(38,549 posts)27. snork
the Governor General is ignorant and made a stupid, uninformed decision
Since the Governor General made no decision at all ... well hm, we could hazard a guess at what that makes you.
You seem to have read "His Excellency the Governor General in Council" at the top of the regulations and thought it meant the GG actually made some decision.
"The Governor General in Council" means the federal Cabinet, with the rubber stamp of the GG.
Any GG who refused to put that stamp on any legislation or regulations enacted by Parliament or made by Cabinet (or another regulation-making authority) would provoke a constitutional crisis the likes of which has not been seen since the King-Byng affair.
Now, legislation by fiat ... that IS what the minority Harper government did year after year when it made orders in council (not subject to any parliamentary oversight) exempting long gun owners from the registration requirement that is very clearly mandatory in the legislation/regulations.
That there was legislation by fiat for sure -- and all right-thinking, democratic Canadians were outraged by it. How 'bout you??
Since the Governor General made no decision at all ... well hm, we could hazard a guess at what that makes you.
You seem to have read "His Excellency the Governor General in Council" at the top of the regulations and thought it meant the GG actually made some decision.
"The Governor General in Council" means the federal Cabinet, with the rubber stamp of the GG.
Any GG who refused to put that stamp on any legislation or regulations enacted by Parliament or made by Cabinet (or another regulation-making authority) would provoke a constitutional crisis the likes of which has not been seen since the King-Byng affair.
Now, legislation by fiat ... that IS what the minority Harper government did year after year when it made orders in council (not subject to any parliamentary oversight) exempting long gun owners from the registration requirement that is very clearly mandatory in the legislation/regulations.
That there was legislation by fiat for sure -- and all right-thinking, democratic Canadians were outraged by it. How 'bout you??
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
101 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I'd like to apologize to Canada for the rampant anti-Canadianism that is perpetuated in this country
ellisonz
Jan 2012
#98
That's right, the courts are absolutly correct and absolutely absolute in their decisions.
Remmah2
Jan 2012
#9
passive agressive behavior tends to bring that out in people that are paying attention.
Tuesday Afternoon
Jan 2012
#87
Great example of legislation by fiat. The GG says it's so, therefore it's so.
slackmaster
Jan 2012
#23
Canada has a more sensible approach to guns and health care than we do. In fact, most countries do.
Hoyt
Jan 2012
#16
perhaps, America should follow suit and make entry to our country more restrictive
Tuesday Afternoon
Jan 2012
#65
Now, now- don't you know that's only for more "progressive" nations?
friendly_iconoclast
Jan 2012
#68
criticizing it is one thing...threatening to leave it is another thing entirely.
Tuesday Afternoon
Jan 2012
#66
But if one *is* familiar with guns, the Valmets are clearly AK derivatives...
friendly_iconoclast
Jan 2012
#48