Gun Control & RKBA

gejohnston

(17,502 posts)

251. winning what argument? You made fool out of yourself

Mon Sep 3, 2012, 02:18 AM

Sep 2012

but I thought I would give you a troll snack. McDonald won't be overturned by anyone partly because it could begin a right wing attack on other incorporation rulings. The larger reason is that no one will have standing to make a case in our lifetimes. I don't see Brady or anyone else pushing anything through the court system to SCOTUS. Brady lawyers depended on "states rights" cases to argue against McDonald, which is a 14A ruling, not a 2A ruling. I would think it would be harder to do since one of those were pretty much overturned. I'm voting for Obama either way.
http://themoderatevoice.com/78129/mcdonald-v-chicago-second-amendment-applied-to-statesmunicipalities/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDonald_v._Chicago

BTW, Jerry Brown as California AG supported McDonald

In 2009, while attorney general, Brown filed a friend-of-the-court brief siding with the National Rifle Assn.'s attempt to overturn a gun ban in Chicago. Brown wrote to the U.S. Supreme Court that he feared "California citizens could be deprived of the constitutional right to possess handguns in their homes."

http://articles.latimes.com/2011/apr/07/local/la-me-brown-guns-20110407

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

337 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

We need a Pro-RKBA group on DU [View all] rDigital Sep 2012 OP

The antis are already rrneck Sep 2012 #1

Thanks to all the new be safeinOhio Sep 2012 #7

What trolls are those? rrneck Sep 2012 #43

Ahhh, the projection: the #1 "Google dumper" right now in the Gungeon has 26 OP's going apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #10

Lets see whatever rrneck Sep 2012 #42

You don't know how to scroll up and down through the first page of the forum? apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #48

So you got nothing. You must be one of the adolescents. nt rrneck Sep 2012 #60

So, you still haven't figured out how your computer's mouse works. That must be tough. n/t. apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #81

No content yet? rrneck Sep 2012 #82

Figure out how to manipulate your computer's mouse, then get back with me. n/t. apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #93

LOL! rrneck Sep 2012 #96

Still haven't figured it out yet, huh? Must be tough. Keep trying - practice makes perfect. apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #98

And yes: everyone browsing by please by all means check out #10: apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #99

Still unable to deliver rrneck Sep 2012 #103

Still haven't got the hang of it, eh? That really turning out to be a toughie. Keep trying! apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #104

Is this how you kick ass? rrneck Sep 2012 #108

Practice makes perfect: give it another go. Sometimes, it just takes patience and perseverance. apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #109

Still none of the facts you desired. nt rrneck Sep 2012 #111

See, you figured out how to use the "search" function on DU, so the computer mouse can't be apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #110

Yes, you're very discrete. rrneck Sep 2012 #112

Funny stuff. A regular laff-riot hereabouts.... apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #113

Yeah. How about some discussion now? rrneck Sep 2012 #114

What do you want to discuss? Figure that out first, then get back with me. n/t. apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #115

See post 42 in response to post 10. nt rrneck Sep 2012 #127

Still waiting: What. Do. You. Want. To. Discuss? "Running and hiding," indeed.... apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #117

For those of you just joining this tedium rrneck Sep 2012 #119

So, you don't want to discuss anything after all, eh? Figures. Get back with me when you do. n/t apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #121

I never left. rrneck Sep 2012 #126

See #48. Here's a handy link: apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #131

I'm still here and you're still running. rrneck Sep 2012 #133

No, the issue at hand is that the biggest "Google dumper" on this forum is a "pro gun progressive," apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #136

Your diverson isn't working. rrneck Sep 2012 #137

There is no "diversion"; I refer all interested to these four posts: apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #138

Still running. rrneck Sep 2012 #141

Still haven't got the hang of how that mouse on your computer works yet, huh? apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #143

Wow, you just got taken to the cleaners. Clames Sep 2012 #145

Wow, you must have the same trouble scrolling up and down with a mouse that your pal does. apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #149

There are questions pending. rrneck Sep 2012 #147

Nope: asked & answered. Now, either ask some new ones, or go find something else to discuss. n/t. apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #151

What relevant facts have you provided rrneck Sep 2012 #153

Here, have one more go at it: apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #152

Just another chickenshit dodge. rrneck Sep 2012 #154

Try, try, try again: apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #155

No facts yet. rrneck Sep 2012 #156

Yep, plenty of facts, you've simply ignored them. But thanks for giving me the opportunity to kick apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #161

Nope, you have provided nothing. Clames Sep 2012 #162

Yep, I have. And it's been quite thoroughly documented & linked. Give it a try: apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #163

Asked for what rrneck Sep 2012 #164

Another emptiless nothing after 20 other nothing posts. RegieRocker Sep 2012 #187

Yep. rrneck Sep 2012 #189

Yep. He just never could grasp the simple mechanics of maniuplating his mouse, or clicking a link apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #190

Harassed and intimidated??? elleng Sep 2012 #2

I know: ain't it just the saddest thing you ever heard? apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #3

Sad? elleng Sep 2012 #4

Yeah, I can just imagine the manly RKBA'er at his desk, shootin' iron strapped to his hip, apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #6

take into account the paranoia factor Skittles Sep 2012 #8

Yep. One of our "pro gun progressives" rigged up a way he could take his deadly toy to the shower apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #11

Was this while he was trying to enjoy eating a chocolate chip cookie? -..__... Sep 2012 #45

That's a pretty cool stow-bag for that AR-15 variant, actually. Like the collapsible stock, too. apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #49

Also, one of our "pro-RKBA" Democrats won't even hazard posting on DU without his trusty Glock apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #14

Why does it bother you if people want a gun in the shower? MercutioATC Sep 2012 #87

It doesn't bother me in the least: I just think people who do such things are insane, paranoid, apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #90

The same could be said of people who call guns "deadly little Phallic Replacement Devices" MercutioATC Sep 2012 #102

1. There is no "Constitutional rights" to tote weaponry around in public. 2. If that guy in the apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #105

Apologies, I didn't realize that the guy was showering in public. MercutioATC Sep 2012 #107

Do you honestly think that a person who goes to the trouble to rig up a waterproof gun bag apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #140

Let's stick to the issue. MercutioATC Sep 2012 #142

You swerved off the issue: I got you back on it. So, you DO believe someone who showers apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #180

I believe that you're more dangerous than him, yes. MercutioATC Sep 2012 #258

Do you honestly believe that it was really rigged in the shower? ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #148

Hey, it was a "pro gun progressive" talking other such specimens, not to some "anti." apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #219

You're operating under a false (and selfish) impression. MercutioATC Sep 2012 #261

You seem fascinated with people showering with guns. Peculiar. Eleanors38 Sep 2013 #336

True, nothing to be intimidated about. Clames Sep 2012 #150

You delicate flower, you SecularMotion Sep 2012 #5

NRA not enough for you? Skittles Sep 2012 #9

echo chambers are boring gejohnston Sep 2012 #12

I'm a member on more than a few gun forums and believe me there is A LOT to disagree on rDigital Sep 2012 #39

That is b.s. RegieRocker Sep 2012 #185

Sounds like a circle jerk to me tularetom Sep 2012 #13

Well stated. Agree 100%. Thank You! n/t DWC Sep 2012 #16

Great post. glacierbay Sep 2012 #21

Bullseye. Paladin Sep 2012 #59

ever ask yourself why? gejohnston Sep 2012 #67

Speaking for myself, even rbka du'ers are not comfortable with that. bluerum Sep 2012 #15

Looks like even your fellow RKBA'ers don't feel the need for a "safe haven" from the apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #17

"Those who support the RKBA are harassed and intimidated"! You meant that as a joke -- jody Sep 2012 #18

It's not an issue of pro-RKBA vs. pro-gun-control, the issue you're petronius Sep 2012 #19

echo-chambers are boring discntnt_irny_srcsm Sep 2012 #65

Only to a small extent, I think: a pro-RKBA-only forum would certainly be petronius Sep 2012 #70

Actually, those are my thoughts, exactly. +1 discntnt_irny_srcsm Sep 2012 #71

I share your opinions about the lack of need for a 4th group on guns. Eleanors38 Sep 2013 #337

I thank the gun-religionists bongbong Sep 2012 #20

you are a liberal? gejohnston Sep 2012 #23

(Y)you are a liberal? apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #34

let me fix the spelling gejohnston Sep 2012 #36

I said "Republican AND conservative nut-jobs." Zimmerman is clearly a conservative nut-job apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #37

I'll wait for the real trial gejohnston Sep 2012 #41

So, we got us a George Zimmerman supporter here. That's interesting - though not surprising. apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #46

supporter of due process gejohnston Sep 2012 #66

Nope: you are a supporter of George Zimmerman. And it's duly noted. n/t. apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #80

Yep: you are for lynch mobs and vigilante "justice" and it's duly noted. n/t gejohnston Sep 2012 #88

I'm sure Zimmerman is comforted by the fact that "pro gun progressives" are in his corner... apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #91

I don't give a shit about him either way, but if defending the rule of law gejohnston Sep 2012 #97

Yes you do, or else we wouldn't be having this conversation. Have you given to Zimmerman's defense apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #100

no, I believe in justice regardless of where it goes gejohnston Sep 2012 #101

We are having this conversation because you support George Zimmerman. Period. n/t. apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #106

Kos There's an informal rule over at Daily Kos that neds to adopted here at D.U.... PavePusher Sep 2012 #168

Well it was worth a try. I guess the main take away is that something needs to be done about rDigital Sep 2012 #22

I guess we could stop feeding them gejohnston Sep 2012 #24

Agreed, he was an enjoyable presence. nt rDigital Sep 2012 #26

I rarely agreed with him glacierbay Sep 2012 #32

What the heck happened there? Perhaps I missed some precipitating event, but petronius Sep 2012 #31

I only know what I read gejohnston Sep 2012 #33

Agreed! Union Scribe Sep 2012 #61

Where did... Spryguy Sep 2012 #25

He got bounced from this group glacierbay Sep 2012 #27

Problem is you Gun people have an agenda orpupilofnature57 Sep 2012 #28

Kind of off-topic for this thread, but it's not actually "gun people" posting petronius Sep 2012 #30

See, Agenda. orpupilofnature57 Sep 2012 #55

So where does GD come into it, and how does this agenda you perceive affect GD? (nt) petronius Sep 2012 #64

I've never gone to that group, I've only orpupilofnature57 Sep 2012 #72

Yep, and it's not a progressive agenda, either. Quite the opposite. n/t. apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #35

Private gun ownership is progressive ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #51

Not repression or advocating merely pointing out orpupilofnature57 Sep 2012 #56

Perhaps you have missed the posts and threads where some are calling for ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #63

I would never advocate eliminating any Group orpupilofnature57 Sep 2012 #68

Sometimes flame wars bring out the worse and it has happened here too many times. glacierbay Sep 2012 #69

Guilty. orpupilofnature57 Sep 2012 #135

Toting weaponry around in public spoiling for a shootout has nothing to do with the progressive apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #89

I see you're trying to pick up the slack left by Hoyt. PavePusher Sep 2012 #169

"Gun people have an agenda" but it's not a problem. We are committed to preserving all natural, jody Sep 2012 #44

Right to guns on school buses, bars, etc. ... eom Kolesar Sep 2012 #52

What part of #44 don't you understand? nt jody Sep 2012 #74

Usurping the word ' PATRIOT ' is a problem. orpupilofnature57 Sep 2012 #58

Your comment re patriot implies either you haven't read or don't understand PA & VT constitutions of jody Sep 2012 #73

Ignore no , Obsess no , But thanks for the great read !! orpupilofnature57 Sep 2012 #134

I voted yes, however.com with truth and a true progressive stance most arguments against are moot. ileus Sep 2012 #29

We're not harassed by the TaliBanners. Common Sense Party Sep 2012 #38

I wasn't speaking for myself of course : ) rDigital Sep 2012 #40

"something needs to be done about the malicious posters" - You mean posters who disagree with you. apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #47

Uhhh...WRONG. We have no problem with posters who disagree with the 2nd Amendment. Common Sense Party Sep 2012 #79

Nope: right. DU TOS states: "Democratic Underground is an online community for apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #83

The Fail is strong with this one. Common Sense Party Sep 2012 #84

Since you had difficulty the first go round: DU TOS states "Democratic Underground is an online apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #92

The only one wilfullllly misreading and misconstruing the Constitution is you, Sparky. Common Sense Party Sep 2012 #120

Since difficulties remain, we'll try again: DU TOS states "Democratic Underground is an online apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #122

Repeating your dreck ad nauseum doesn't advance your argument, Common Sense Party Sep 2012 #123

We'll try it again: DU TOS states "Democratic Underground is an online community apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #128

Yawn. Common Sense Party Sep 2012 #130

Uh-huh - about what I figured. n/t. apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #132

You're bullying people right here in the post were I am asking for a new forum because of bullies. rDigital Sep 2012 #159

It is the tactics of those unable to otherwise defend their point of view ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #166

There is a post needing your attention, Digit: apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #173

This message was self-deleted by its author rDigital Sep 2012 #221

Posting facts the "pro gun progressives" refuse to answer or refute isn't "bullying," Digit: apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #176

This is hilarious ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #50

You sound bored Kolesar Sep 2012 #53

More bemused actually ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #62

Aren't there about a hundred other message boards where you will be ok? Kolesar Sep 2012 #54

I've seen R. Lee Ermey and NRA ads here NT Trunk Monkey Sep 2012 #75

Yep. rDigital Sep 2012 #85

That's what I don't get, never have: why bring the NRA and GOP agenda to DU? apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #95

Trolling, plain and simple DanTex Sep 2012 #116

Exactly right - that's all it is. A few years back, a mutual friend of ours PM'd me a link to a gun apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #124

Your false assumptions are what are confusing you... ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #118

I'm not "confused" in the slightest, "Professor." Tell us: what was your dissertation concerning? apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #125

My background has been published here in the past ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #139

So, you are refusing to provide evidence to substantiate your credentials. apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #144

As has been said many times before, "On the internet, no one knows you are a dog" ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #146

You claim to be some kind of "professor," yet refuse to provide any substantiation to apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #157

Another rube who does not understand the basics ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #160

Yes, the onus is precisely on you to provide proof of your "bonafides" - you are the one apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #167

Where have I cited my $DAYJOB to give weight to my posts in this group? ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #170

To "out" you? Are you ashamed of having once been a "professor"? Would you suffer apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #171

Frequently use it here in RKBA discussions? ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #175

Either provide the substantiaton to back up your claim, or cease making the claim. apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #178

Do you every read for content? ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #182

Are you going to provide substantiation for your dubious claim, or cease making the claim? apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #183

I am still waiting for you to substantiate that I cite $DAYJOB to give my posts authority in ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #192

Are you going to provide substantiation for you dubious claim, or cease making the claim? apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #195

"Being a prof is my retirement job" - Uh-huh. Do you post on DU from campus? n/t. apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #184

I post via a proxy ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #193

Why? n/t. apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #196

Because I choose to ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #200

Uh-huh. Riiiiiiggghhhttt.....in any event, I only ask because even a brief perusal of the Gungeon apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #202

I don't see an issue here ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #215

Of course you don't: you're not a professor, conduct no lectures nor participate in any labs, apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #216

You are still double posting responses ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #220

Uh-huh. Busted on bogus claims, and still trying to salvage a scrap of credibility. n/t. apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #223

Far from it, but please continue to dance ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #224

You made the bogus claim, and have for YEARS: now, the consequences of posting apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #227

The claim is not bogus and you continue to dance for us ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #233

The claim IS bogus, as shown. But feel free to post any substantiating evidence you wish... apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #237

You still can't figure out... ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #247

Plus, you've just busted yourself by claiming you pack heat as an employee on a campus apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #217

You have not looked at all the exceptions ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #218

Coy will not salvage your credibility: you've been busted. You are not a "professor." apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #225

You missed the exception, but please keep trying ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #226

Nope. But I will keep laughing. n/t. apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #229

As you like...but there are several exceptions that you have still not found ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #231

It will be as I like, as what has been demonstrated here this evening is (1) irrefutable and apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #235

Just because you cannot figure out how the pieces fit does not mean they do not fit ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #243

No, it means you refuse to answer the straight-forward questions. n/t. apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #249

You claim to be in California: is so, you're not packing on campus. Unless you're campus police. apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #256

BTW, I don't think the DU admins look kindly upon posters who use proxies. apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #203

I don't see that in the TOS ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #205

I assume you're either going to provide proof to substantiate your claim - now busted (see below) - apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #207

TOR nodes get unwanted attention, mostly from Feds ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #210

Uh-huh. Riiiiiiggghhhttt..... apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #212

Like I said: kinda stepped in this one, didn't yah? Might wanna rethink this "professor" claim. n/t. apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #214

Questions await, "professor": answer them. apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #208

I'm sorry that you have to deal with these personal attacks, this was one of the rDigital Sep 2012 #158

You cannot be a black man in the US without developing a thick skin when it comes to idiots. ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #165

Keep up the good work. Education is a powerful construct and fosters life long rewarding rDigital Sep 2012 #172

I keep the firearms and the university at arms length ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #179

You "carry concealed" on campus? Riiiiiiggghtttt..... apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #181

Actually I do ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #186

Actually, you don't. Even the Utah and Colorado exceptions apply only to students, not to employees. apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #188

There are other exceptions...figure it out ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #191

No, there are not. Of the five states that currently allow STUDENTS to pack heat apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #194

Keep looking, you will find it ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #198

In other words, you've been busted on your bogus claim, and are now trying salvage some credibility. apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #201

No you haven't since you have not found the right answer ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #204

Yes, I've found the right one: there is not a single campus that allows employees, as opposed to apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #206

which one is it? If you know, please share. gejohnston Sep 2012 #209

This message was self-deleted by its author petronius Sep 2012 #211

Kinda stepped in this one, didn't yah? Like I said: might wanna rethink this "professor" claim. apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #197

And now the self-deletions from even your *allies* start, as some of them begin to realize just how apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #222

Did you look up what he posted? ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #228

Are you going to cease making the "professor" claim, now that it's been definitively shown you are apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #230

I will take that as a no ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #232

Take it however you wish: the fact remains, by your own errant post, posted before apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #234

Why are you bullying in my anti-bullying thread? It's disgusting. Discuss the issues, we are all rDigital Sep 2012 #236

Posting facts the "pro gun progressives" refuse to answer or refute isn't "bullying," Digit: apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #239

I DON'T ANSWER TO BULLIES. THEY ANSWER TO ME! rDigital Sep 2012 #242

Posting facts the "pro gun progressives" refuse to answer or refute isn't "bullying," Digit: apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #246

My answer: YES, YOU ARE A BULLY! rDigital Sep 2012 #250

Calm yourself, Digit: I win, actually. The "professor" claims to teach in California, and there is apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #263

winning what argument? You made fool out of yourself gejohnston Sep 2012 #251

Nope: I won it. It took hours, but our "professor" now says he's in CA. He's not packing heat there, apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #259

YOU CAN CARRY IN CALI COLLEGE WITH A CCW rDigital Sep 2012 #282

YOU ARE WRONG rDigital Sep 2012 #241

I take it that you still do not have a clue... ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #244

Except, the answer is bogus. You no more had any idea what the policy was until Digit posted apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #248

You can carry in Texas with written permission from the dean rDigital Sep 2012 #257

Focus, Digit: California is the state we're talking about, not Texas. n/t. apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #264

Why wouldn't there be an African American professor at UC? gejohnston Sep 2012 #262

I don't know: why wouldn't there be? You're the one asking the question. apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #266

you seemed to imply that it was UC would be a racist gejohnston Sep 2012 #269

I "implied" no such thing. I was reiterating the claims our "professor" has made about himself, apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #281

You have gotten nothing right all evening ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #283

Oh yes I have, and I'm STILL getting it right. apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #298

Where do you "teach," "professor"? We can clear all this up right now. n/t. apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #311

YOU CAN CARRY IN CALI COLLEGE WITH A CCW rDigital Sep 2012 #284

The law in "CA" - so, you're not a professor after all, by your own admission. apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #252

No, I have a perfect answer, actually: your claims to "professorship," by your OWN ADMISSION, apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #265

you didn't read the whole thing, there are always exceptions. gejohnston Sep 2012 #271

You missed it again ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #288

So, you claim you have written permission to carry a gun on a California campus? apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #302

The Black Knight Strikes again. Quit bullying in my thread. You lose. rDigital Sep 2012 #305

I think he ran out of troll food gejohnston Sep 2012 #312

Addendum to #248: by your own admission, you are not a professor. You claim to be a "prof" in CA, apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #267

BTW, you are so wrong it hurts. rDigital Sep 2012 #238

why do I have the feeling that gejohnston Sep 2012 #240

California's laws do not allow concealed carry on campus period: apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #254

YOU CAN CARRY IN CALI COLLEGE WITH A CCW rDigital Sep 2012 #285

Edit: looks like that's irrelevant. Our "professor" now claims to be in California, apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #245

You can also carry in the state Washington if the college doesn't prohibit carry. nt rDigital Sep 2012 #253

You can openly carry a firearm at any public college in Ohio. Concealed is banned by statute. rDigital Sep 2012 #255

Focus, Digit: the "professor" now states he's teaching in California. Not Ohio. n/t. apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #260

With a California CCW permit you can carry at a college rDigital Sep 2012 #268

No, you cannot: that provision does not apply to EMPLOYEES, for starters, and for seconders apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #270

Also, start on page 6. : ) rDigital Sep 2012 #272

What's "for shame" is you keep posting falsehoods about concealed carry on CA campuses: apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #276

http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/cacode/PEN/3/1/15/1/s626.9 rDigital Sep 2012 #294

it says a person gejohnston Sep 2012 #274

No, you cannot carry on California campuses: apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #273

You are so full of it. I have evidence proof. You have nothing! rDigital Sep 2012 #275

You just confirmed what I said, and then claimed I had "nothing." Funny stuff. apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #279

The school is free to make their own rules. No state law banning it. YOU LOSE. rDigital Sep 2012 #280

YOU CAN CARRY IN CALI COLLEGE WITH A CCW rDigital Sep 2012 #286

No, you cannot. As shown. Simply repeating the same thing over and over doesn't make it so. n/t. apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #290

JUST PROVED IT rDigital Sep 2012 #291

http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/cacode/PEN/3/1/15/1/s626.9 rDigital Sep 2012 #292

you are joking gejohnston Sep 2012 #278

Now now bad bully, go sit in the corner and think about what you've done. rDigital Sep 2012 #277

Wrong, as shown: but thanks for playing. n/t. apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #287

YOU CAN CARRY IN CALI COLLEGE WITH A CCW rDigital Sep 2012 #289

No, you cannot. Let's start with UCLA: apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #295

YOU LOSE BULLY rDigital Sep 2012 #296

The Professor HAS WRITTEN PERMISSION. His "exception". You lose, quit bullying in my thread. nt rDigital Sep 2012 #299

He has never stated he had "WRITTEN PERMISSION," and he doesn't in any event since he's not a "prof" apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #306

Quit bullying in my thread. You lost. Take it. Just take it and enjoy it. rDigital Sep 2012 #307

he said he has written permission gejohnston Sep 2012 #300

Stepped in it big time. rDigital Sep 2012 #301

Nope, quite the opposite. He has never stated he has written permission, and he doesn't, and apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #304

you know this how? gejohnston Sep 2012 #310

he thinks he is on a roll gejohnston Sep 2012 #308

I don't think there's anything "dark" or "evil" about it: I just think these "professor" and apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #315

have you ever lived in California? gejohnston Sep 2012 #322

Nope: he stepped in it. He claimed he toted a firearm around campus, and this has been shown to be apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #309

I know it can be hard to admit when you are wrong, but you are so embarassingly wrong rDigital Sep 2012 #314

how about reading the relevant California Penal Code gejohnston Sep 2012 #316

http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/cacode/PEN/3/1/15/1/s626.9 rDigital Sep 2012 #293

... apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #297

your point? gejohnston Sep 2012 #303

It hasn't been "refuted" as there is no one packing heat on CA campuses unless they're cops, retired apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #313

he doesn't have to show you a fucking thing gejohnston Sep 2012 #317

If he wants to make claims on a public discussion board and retain any credibility he does. apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #319

NO one is going to tell you where they work. This conversation is academic at best, rDigital Sep 2012 #320

No, it's not "academic": make claims on a discussion board, either back them up or quit making them. apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #324

You lost, he's legal no matter what with a CA CCW. rDigital Sep 2012 #326

He stated he had an exception. rDigital Sep 2012 #318

"if the Prof speaks the truth." - Hinges on that, doesn't it? He could clear it up in a second, apocalypsehow Sep 2012 #321

He's probably sleeping. You should get some sleep too rDigital Sep 2012 #323

if he shows it, it would clear it up in a second gejohnston Sep 2012 #325

Have you provided titles of some of your work? Marengo Sep 2012 #329

Nothing written by that member should be taken seriously. NYC_SKP Sep 2013 #330

Personally ... holdencaufield Sep 2012 #57

Agreed sarisataka Sep 2012 #94

harassed and intimidated? in the gungeon? series? Warren Stupidity Sep 2012 #76

seriously? not series? gejohnston Sep 2012 #77

ah padawan, you have to know the reference before you police the word. Warren Stupidity Sep 2012 #78

Count me in. darkangel218 Sep 2012 #86

Yes. theinquisitivechad Sep 2012 #129

Thanks for the concern, but most of us are O.K. here. MercutioATC Sep 2012 #174

And forego the tales of ninja actions and magical tinned veggies? Riftaxe Sep 2012 #177

Well, it looks like I've lost this one in the poll, but in reality... I have won. rDigital Sep 2012 #199

And, in the end, it's best I think. NYC_SKP Sep 2013 #331

The member you are responding to has been banned SecularMotion Sep 2013 #332

there are a lot of gun owning liberals gejohnston Sep 2013 #333

Does that include the ones who have banned themselves rrneck Sep 2013 #334

plus a blue million. Tuesday Afternoon Sep 2013 #335

You may have a point, but it would be... Deep13 Sep 2012 #213

I'm reminded of a story my dad told me Glaug-Eldare Sep 2012 #327

This had me laughing and clapping to myself. theinquisitivechad Sep 2012 #328