Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Ultimately this whole thread is offensive. [View all]Atypical Liberal
(5,412 posts)79. Wrong.
Neither is using the Internet.
Really? You really think that speech, particularly political speech, over the internet is not Constitutionally protected? Really?
Depends on the streets. They don't QUITE hit 200 MPH on some of the straights in the various Grand Prix races around the world, but it isn't for lack of trying.
I'm sorry, I assumed we were talking about firearms in public, not in special-use places.
And who cares anyway? Safety shouldn't determine what makes my freedom!!!
Exactly so. Safety should not determine what makes freedom. To quote Benjamin Franklin, "Those who would forsake essential liberty to gain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
If that was so, then the safest course of action would be to get rid of all guns.
Or live in little padded cells with each of us having our own police officer watching over us. Not very free, though.
Really? You really think that speech, particularly political speech, over the internet is not Constitutionally protected? Really?
Depends on the streets. They don't QUITE hit 200 MPH on some of the straights in the various Grand Prix races around the world, but it isn't for lack of trying.
I'm sorry, I assumed we were talking about firearms in public, not in special-use places.
And who cares anyway? Safety shouldn't determine what makes my freedom!!!
Exactly so. Safety should not determine what makes freedom. To quote Benjamin Franklin, "Those who would forsake essential liberty to gain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
If that was so, then the safest course of action would be to get rid of all guns.
Or live in little padded cells with each of us having our own police officer watching over us. Not very free, though.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
112 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
A person lawfully carrying a gun is statistically far, far safer than someone driving 200 MPH.
Atypical Liberal
Sep 2012
#57
Breaking news! Calling fellow DUers "chickenshit trolls" is now OK (as long you're a pro-gunner)
DanTex
Sep 2012
#37
PMFJI, bongbong, but did you just mean to say "It's OK If You Are A Gay Republican?"
slackmaster
Sep 2012
#13
Sometimes, when posting from my cell phone, I don't even notice when it separates words like that.
eqfan592
Sep 2012
#70
You might be picking up a stalker. But you're still way behind: I have like 8 of them...
DanTex
Sep 2012
#62