Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: The Liberal Gun Club. [View all]Atypical Liberal
(5,412 posts)28. LOL - "political indulgence"
The 1A didn't kill the ambassador. An armed mob did.
And what inspired that armed mob? The first-amendment-protect religious ramblings of an idiot. The person or persons responsible for making that film with the specific intent of inflaming Muslims is, as far as I'm concerned, just as responsible for the deaths as the armed mob is. Just like a person yelling "fire" in a crowded theater.
And what you have enjoyed all these years along with your genuine rights is a political indulgence of your access to guns and ammunition.
The second amendment was created just for people with your sort of attitude - that my rights can be considered a "political indulgence".
The Bill of Rights is not a political indulgence. No part of it is.
A highly influential and unduly popular political indulgence of a particular personal kink.
That's all it is and could ever be.
I can't believe a liberal could utter such things. That sounds just like the argument against gay marriage.
And what inspired that armed mob? The first-amendment-protect religious ramblings of an idiot. The person or persons responsible for making that film with the specific intent of inflaming Muslims is, as far as I'm concerned, just as responsible for the deaths as the armed mob is. Just like a person yelling "fire" in a crowded theater.
And what you have enjoyed all these years along with your genuine rights is a political indulgence of your access to guns and ammunition.
The second amendment was created just for people with your sort of attitude - that my rights can be considered a "political indulgence".
The Bill of Rights is not a political indulgence. No part of it is.
A highly influential and unduly popular political indulgence of a particular personal kink.
That's all it is and could ever be.
I can't believe a liberal could utter such things. That sounds just like the argument against gay marriage.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
42 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
You keep saying it's a non existent right w/o providing any proof of what you claim.
glacierbay
Sep 2012
#3
The 2A speaks for itself. It has been ridiculously adorned with superfluous attributes.
Loudly
Sep 2012
#5
The American People have repeatedly been dragged kicking and screaming into modernity.
Loudly
Sep 2012
#32