Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control & RKBA

Oneka

(653 posts)

19. Without electiral consequences

Reply to SecularMotion (Reply #11)

Sat Sep 15, 2012, 01:39 PM

Sep 2012

lobbying may as well be prayer. Lobbying
does not exist, outside of the framework of electoral consequence. An empty threat, of the ability to influence elections, would produce weak lobbying results. Recent NRA victories, indicate strong lobbying results. How can this be?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

30 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

How Much Does the NRA Influence Elections? [View all] SecularMotion Sep 2012 OP

How much does... discntnt_irny_srcsm Sep 2012 #1

Please don't disrupt threads SecularMotion Sep 2012 #2

no thanks discntnt_irny_srcsm Sep 2012 #15

Whiner, like PP's follow on whining ... eom Kolesar Sep 2012 #27

I enjoy irony discntnt_irny_srcsm Sep 2012 #28

Google Dump ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #3

Hi stalker SecularMotion Sep 2012 #4

At least you are finally posting in your Google dump threads ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #8

it couldn't be Less Than -I- think ... because Less Than Zero is not an option Tuesday Afternoon Sep 2012 #5

Please refer to post #2 SecularMotion Sep 2012 #6

This message was self-deleted by its author Tuesday Afternoon Sep 2012 #7

Please refer to posts 1 & 2 ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #9

So which is it? Oneka Sep 2012 #10

There's a difference between lobbying for legislation and influencing elections. SecularMotion Sep 2012 #11

Without electiral consequences Oneka Sep 2012 #19

Ain't you got the memo? It's whatever fits the agenda at the time. shadowrider Sep 2012 #12

Oh the "mouth" I heard it came from a different orifice DonP Sep 2012 #14

3A) Represents too many gun owners who are a one issue voting block n/t shadowrider Sep 2012 #16

Well, we don't need any of their stinking votes anyway DonP Sep 2012 #17

I hear ya. n/t shadowrider Sep 2012 #18

Very Romneyish, isn't it? friendly_iconoclast Sep 2012 #20

ONLY 29 OP'S on the front page. You're slipping n/t shadowrider Sep 2012 #13

I don't know the quantitative answer but DWC Sep 2012 #21

None... ileus Sep 2012 #22

Absolutely it does. Before each election I request a scorecard from the NRA Atypical Liberal Sep 2012 #23

You would vote against the Democrats so that you can promote guns Kolesar Sep 2012 #26

Yes, I have voted against Democrats so that I can protect the second amendment. Atypical Liberal Sep 2012 #29

Not nearly as much as RKBA supporters who vote. aikoaiko Sep 2012 #24

Yet you demonize them at every chance you get rl6214 Sep 2012 #25

Easy answer to that question: GreenStormCloud Sep 2012 #30