Ohio: Buckeyes for Concealed Carry President Uses Handgun to Defend Family

[Clames]

121. Getting worse is your understanding of basic mathematics.

Some of the studies are older, some more recent. I have no idea what point you are trying to make except for trying to grasp at whatever you can think of in order to deny the science.

The obvious point is that a proper researcher won't cherry pick data sets to support a foregone conclusion. You seem to support that type of research since it in the only type of research that spins reality into a distorted form you can accept. Fact is, he left out nearly a decade's worth of studies and information which, if you actually read those studies that occurred after CCW laws had become very widespread over the last 7 year, probably would have shown an entirely different result. Objectivity is another sore point for you it seems.

LOL. Those ratios are the empirical results of data collected in one particular study, which examined gunshot injuries of different kinds in three different cities.

Yes, that is called cherry picking. So nice of you to finally figure that out. Never mind the fact that one particular study was grossly misleading and poorly conducted to a point that even the authors never bothered to defend it in later years. Your next trick is for you to figure out a way to wade out of the pile of bullshit you've gotten yourself into. Good luck...