Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Ohio: Buckeyes for Concealed Carry President Uses Handgun to Defend Family [View all]gejohnston
(17,502 posts)149. you screech "you uneducated oaf" but don't explain
why or how any of it is relevant.
Are you aware that Russia ranks below Libya, Panama, Mexico, and Saudi Arabia in the human development index. I mean, beyond pictures of airplanes, do you have any logical argument as to why Russia is a better point of comparison than Western Europe, Canada, Australia? Do you know of any social scientist that has suggested that Russia is a more appropriate comparison? Do you think that the fact that Russia has a low life expectancy is a good argument against single payer healthcare? Or are you only cherry-picking Russia because it's the only example you can find of a country with high homicide and strict gun laws?
Basically, every country that has a higher murder rate than we do also has stricter laws. If you compare income inequality, we are closer to Mexico and Russia to any of the other countries. We do know that after Canada passed their 1977 law, and Australia passed their 1987 law, the murder and suicide rate did not change. Australia's murder rate was already dropping, but did not drop any sharper. While gun suicide rates dropped slightly, the suicide rate did not.
The only thing the chart actually shows is that rural areas have higher suicide rates than less rural areas. Granted, gun ownership is higher in rural areas in US, Canada, and Australia. Rural Japan, South Korea, and UK people off themselves more than their urban counterparts.
Yes, I get that Japan has a high suicide rate. This is because guns are just one factor, not the only factor. Nobody is claiming that you can predict the suicide rate exactly based on the number of guns. As I was discussing with ellisonz above, the whole concept of multivariate analysis, that there can be more than one factor involved, always seems mindboggling to the gun loons. Japan has a high suicide rates for cultural reasons. If they had a lot of guns, there is little doubt that their suicide rate would be even higher.
And US has higher murder rates because of cultural and historical reasons. And no, if Japan had gun laws like Vermont, their suicide and murder rates would not change. Do I base than on something John Lott said? No, I lived there and studied their culture and history. It is not that "gun loons can't grasp the concept of multivariante analysis" it is that you use personal attacks when asked to explain your position. Knowing how to string terms together to sound impressive doesn't mean you actually know what they are talking about. It kind of reminds me of a high school locker room, the guy who talks the most shit about how much he is getting, isn't.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
198 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Ohio: Buckeyes for Concealed Carry President Uses Handgun to Defend Family [View all]
rDigital
Sep 2012
OP
This sounds like a made up story- why would a white man call another white man "white honky"?
kimbutgar
Sep 2012
#1
Do you have another source for this besides "Students for Concealed Carry - Ohio"?
SecularMotion
Sep 2012
#3
I'm sure there's a police report. We can make that your responsibility to go and fetch it.
rDigital
Sep 2012
#8
Funny how he'll post anti gun articles from the VPC, Huffington Post, or the Brady org.
glacierbay
Sep 2012
#15
Make sure you keep all these posts in mind the next time you consider calling a gun owner...
Clames
Sep 2012
#22
The story sounds suspicious, not the gun owner. I too own a handgun, but the story sounds made up.
bluecoat_fan
Sep 2012
#83
It seems to me that this is the first statistical study you have ever seen in your life.
DanTex
Sep 2012
#43
LOL. With the way you take things out of context, you ought to work for the Romney campaign.
DanTex
Sep 2012
#86
Why, are you his recruiter? No thanks I'll stick with Obama, but my condolences on your desperate,
TPaine7
Sep 2012
#88
Maybe Ron Paul is more your speed -- one of those "it's unconstitutional" wackos you seem to like.
DanTex
Sep 2012
#89
Until you showed up to try and settle some old scores, this was, in fact, a discussion about a
DanTex
Sep 2012
#92
Let me guess, the Brady campaign is the only sufficiently unbiased source of information
4th law of robotics
Sep 2012
#33
If you must ignore the FBI's studies on this then I think we have nothing to discuss
4th law of robotics
Sep 2012
#53
Excellent. Do you acknowledge that while it was dropping total guns owned
4th law of robotics
Sep 2012
#59
LOL. Ignoring me again. I guess when you have no evidence on your side, that's the only play!
DanTex
Sep 2012
#64
Yeah, that guy tends to make a lot of noise and then hide when evidence is presented.
DanTex
Sep 2012
#128
LOL. The "creationist" charge by the guy who's intent on ignoring the scientific evidence.
DanTex
Sep 2012
#131
Still dodging. Whatever you do, make sure you don't try and make a substantive point!
DanTex
Sep 2012
#180
Still dodging! Proxy variables, peer reviewed studies. Any of that ring a bell?
DanTex
Sep 2012
#188
"Peer Reviewed" garbage is still garbage. Everyone has an axe to grind, especially those in your
rDigital
Sep 2012
#84
I deny your brand of opinion-based science. I quite enjoy the fact-based science though.
Clames
Sep 2012
#119
Those with a fear of instruments have more of a theological view on gun control than logical.
rDigital
Sep 2012
#122
Funny you bring up "theological view" when you are the one denying the empirical evidence.
DanTex
Sep 2012
#124
Well that's just like your opinion, man. You're peer-reviewed tripe is "peer reviewed" by people
rDigital
Sep 2012
#126
So many characters to say so little. Ignore the inconvenient truths, keep your head in the sand.
rDigital
Sep 2012
#144
Because keeping people from killing themselves is really a possibility and by extension a valid
rDigital
Sep 2012
#146
I'm not arguing with the numbers of that site. I'm saying that suicide isn't a valid gun control
rDigital
Sep 2012
#148
Yes, and the assault rates are similar to ours. Not nearly as far out of line as homicide.
DanTex
Sep 2012
#190
Don't know about gun robberies in Canada. I've seen 40% for the percent of Canada's murders by gun
DanTex
Sep 2012
#195
I don't know if it actually made the news. The link in the OP is to Buckeyes for Concealed Carry.
DanTex
Sep 2012
#70
They are at the link in the OP. I include them as they answer questions raised on this thread:
friendly_iconoclast
Sep 2012
#103