Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
Showing Original Post only (View all)A steep drop in crime, but do you feel safer? [View all]

Los Angeles police block off the 3rd Street tunnel after a man was shot there in October last year. (Gina Ferazzi / Los Angeles Times)
L.A. had fewer crimes last year than it did in 1957 the mayor calls the numbers 'mind-boggling' but the statistics may not be equally reassuring to everyone.
By Sandy Banks
January 7, 2012
A newsroom has its own way of tracking a city's trend toward diminishing crime.
Twenty years ago, a reporter tallying crime stats for our newspaper's weekly blotter might sift through dozens of killings on a single weekend. There were more than 1,000 homicides a year. Last year, there were fewer than 300 homicides and many weekends with no killings.
Ten years ago, reporters working the streets kept mental lists of neighborhoods considered too dangerous to visit alone. Now, no neighborhood is off-limits. That sense of ambient criminal menace is gone.
----------
The reasons are complicated and ripe for debate: better policing and more community involvement; fewer drugs and fuller prisons; an explosion in new technology; and the fading profile of violent gangs.
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-banks-20120107,0,6414204.column
57 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The probability of becoming a victim of a violent crime is so small compared to things like vehicle
slackmaster
Jan 2012
#4
for personal reasons, no. although I have heard a rumor that my attackers have been killed. -
Tuesday Afternoon
Jan 2012
#10
As long as they don't cause a rise, no one should have any problem with it.
friendly_iconoclast
Jan 2012
#20
Disagree. People routinely carrying guns is not good for society, short- or long-term.
Hoyt
Jan 2012
#21
Of course it does. All moralizing prohibitionism is alike at heart.
friendly_iconoclast
Jan 2012
#27
Are you plumping for political tests, or some sort of "niceness" override?
friendly_iconoclast
Jan 2012
#31
One of his biographers attributes it to him, or uses it as a summation of his position.
X_Digger
Jan 2012
#36
I'm still waiting for you to acknowledge people can have legitimate disagreements...
ellisonz
Jan 2012
#49
You'd best get busy if you want to amend the Constitution. It's not easy...
friendly_iconoclast
Jan 2012
#35