Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control & RKBA

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

TPaine7

(4,286 posts)
Mon Oct 1, 2012, 01:57 PM Oct 2012

Politico: House Oversight Committee & Fast and Furious whistleblower demand 'Fortune' retract story [View all]

John Dodson, the Special Agent who blew the whistle on the Fast and Furious gunwalking scandal, is calling on Fortune Magazine to retract its landmark article asserting that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives "never intentionally allowed guns to fall into the hands of Mexican drug cartels."

In a letter addressed to Fortune managing editor Andrew Serwer yesterday, obtained by POLITICO, Dodson's lawyer called reporter Katherine Eban's article "demonstrably false in many respects" when compared to a report from the Justice Department Inspector General released earlier this month, and said "a retraction is in order to correct the record."

"At a minimum, Fortune was on notice that this conclusion was dubious at the time the article was published, as this conclusion had already been publicly contradicted not only by the whistleblowers who had first-hand knowledge of Fast and Furious, but also by the White House, Attorney General Eric Holder, ATF Director Kenneth Melson, and the majority and minorit y staff reports of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform," Robert N. Driscoll, a lawyer at Alston & Bird LLP, wrote in the letter, sent to Serwer via email. By contrast, he went on to argue, Eban's "tale" was "based largely on one source" that failed to persuade the Inspector General.

The letter comes one week after the House Oversight Committee also demanded Fortune retract its story. "The DOJ report "firmly rejects Eban's conclusions," Committee spokesman Frederick Hill told POLITICO at the time.

http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2012/09/exclusive-fast-and-furious-whistleblower-demands-fortune-136926.html


Hmmmm. The bolded part sounds familiar, like a point yours truly made back when the Rhodes Scholar's report first came up on DU:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1172&pid=47366

and

http://www.democraticunderground.com/117249117

It will be interesting to see whether Fortune issues a retraction and throws the Rhodes Scholar under the bus or whether they stand by her and leave their credibility under the bus.
33 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Intimidation is standard operating procedure for Republicans. Dawson Leery Oct 2012 #1
???! TPaine7 Oct 2012 #2
The Republicans (both in the house and in the Gungeon) are having trouble letting go their beloved DanTex Oct 2012 #3
Correct. This is why NO RETRACTION should be issued. Dawson Leery Oct 2012 #4
That is obvious and pathetic spin. TPaine7 Oct 2012 #5
I know this must be hard for you to accept, but the Fast and Furious "scandal" is over. DanTex Oct 2012 #7
In other words, you can't refute a word I said, so you'll stick to innuendo. Boring, but smart. n/t TPaine7 Oct 2012 #8
LOL. After being proved wrong, the gun fanatic will typically just repeat the false statement DanTex Oct 2012 #9
So you "prove" a discredited author right by citing the discredited author?! TPaine7 Oct 2012 #10
So you call an author "discredited" because she upset some Republicans by DanTex Oct 2012 #11
She was discredited long before the IG's report came out by those who care about reality as opposed TPaine7 Oct 2012 #13
IOW, she was "discredited" by Republicans and gun bloggers. DanTex Oct 2012 #15
Of course. Holder and Cngressional Democrats = Republicans and gun bloggers. TPaine7 Oct 2012 #17
Nope. Holder didn't actually say "the Fortune article is wrong." That would be you and the DanTex Oct 2012 #18
LOL! If only your humor were intentional. TPaine7 Oct 2012 #21
Wow. That was an, umm, interesting useless tangent! DanTex Oct 2012 #23
Sigh. "Those who care about reality" are Holder and congressional Democrats. And I put words in TPaine7 Oct 2012 #24
Well, it's easy to prove yourself right if you just make things up. DanTex Oct 2012 #26
since when was supporting whistle blower retaliation gejohnston Oct 2012 #27
that is an inane pant load gejohnston Oct 2012 #25
Again, it's you and the right-wing press versus the reality-based community. DanTex Oct 2012 #28
you don't know NRA talking points gejohnston Oct 2012 #29
DanTex is clueless about my sources and where I get my ideas. TPaine7 Oct 2012 #32
The people who agree with me—or whom I agree with—are AG Holder and congressional Democrats. TPaine7 Oct 2012 #33
Actually there was, gejohnston Oct 2012 #14
Please point out who is a Berserker Oct 2012 #16
Sounds like a good story to tell a jury. DanTex Oct 2012 #19
Do you mean Berserker Oct 2012 #22
I can't say that i'm shocked Oneka Oct 2012 #6
To paraphrase an attorneys' rule of thumb, TPaine7 Oct 2012 #12
+1, N/T Oneka Oct 2012 #20
Actually... Callisto32 Oct 2012 #30
Um... Reasonable_Argument Oct 2012 #31
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Politico: House Oversight...»Reply #0