Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
7. I know this must be hard for you to accept, but the Fast and Furious "scandal" is over.
Mon Oct 1, 2012, 04:16 PM
Oct 2012

Like the Fortune author pointed out, there really aren't any major factual disparities, and the Fortune article and IG report agree on the most essential conclusions, for example, that there was no conspiracy to let guns walk. This contradicts what the right-wingers (in the House and also in the Gungeon) have been insisting for months, which is that this couldn't possibly be a "botched sting" and there must have been some ulterior motive. We even had a few morons doing things like comparing F&F to Watergate (some of those trolls have since been banned, but others have not).

Of course, to those of us in the reality-based community, it was obvious all along that this was basically a witch-hunt, based on conspiracy theories that were born on loony gun blogs and got mainstreamed by FOX News. After all, as pretty much everyone outside the NRA bubble knows, the real reason that so many guns flow across the border to Mexico is not some ATF conspiracy, but rather the absurdly lax gun laws in border states that might as well have been written by the drug cartels and gun smugglers. And now the IG report has come out and put the conspiracy theories to rest once and for all.

Since I started posting in the gungeon, I have seen very few instances where pro-gun ideologues adjust their views based on factual and empirical evidence. That trend continues...

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Intimidation is standard operating procedure for Republicans. Dawson Leery Oct 2012 #1
???! TPaine7 Oct 2012 #2
The Republicans (both in the house and in the Gungeon) are having trouble letting go their beloved DanTex Oct 2012 #3
Correct. This is why NO RETRACTION should be issued. Dawson Leery Oct 2012 #4
That is obvious and pathetic spin. TPaine7 Oct 2012 #5
I know this must be hard for you to accept, but the Fast and Furious "scandal" is over. DanTex Oct 2012 #7
In other words, you can't refute a word I said, so you'll stick to innuendo. Boring, but smart. n/t TPaine7 Oct 2012 #8
LOL. After being proved wrong, the gun fanatic will typically just repeat the false statement DanTex Oct 2012 #9
So you "prove" a discredited author right by citing the discredited author?! TPaine7 Oct 2012 #10
So you call an author "discredited" because she upset some Republicans by DanTex Oct 2012 #11
She was discredited long before the IG's report came out by those who care about reality as opposed TPaine7 Oct 2012 #13
IOW, she was "discredited" by Republicans and gun bloggers. DanTex Oct 2012 #15
Of course. Holder and Cngressional Democrats = Republicans and gun bloggers. TPaine7 Oct 2012 #17
Nope. Holder didn't actually say "the Fortune article is wrong." That would be you and the DanTex Oct 2012 #18
LOL! If only your humor were intentional. TPaine7 Oct 2012 #21
Wow. That was an, umm, interesting useless tangent! DanTex Oct 2012 #23
Sigh. "Those who care about reality" are Holder and congressional Democrats. And I put words in TPaine7 Oct 2012 #24
Well, it's easy to prove yourself right if you just make things up. DanTex Oct 2012 #26
since when was supporting whistle blower retaliation gejohnston Oct 2012 #27
that is an inane pant load gejohnston Oct 2012 #25
Again, it's you and the right-wing press versus the reality-based community. DanTex Oct 2012 #28
you don't know NRA talking points gejohnston Oct 2012 #29
DanTex is clueless about my sources and where I get my ideas. TPaine7 Oct 2012 #32
The people who agree with me—or whom I agree with—are AG Holder and congressional Democrats. TPaine7 Oct 2012 #33
Actually there was, gejohnston Oct 2012 #14
Please point out who is a Berserker Oct 2012 #16
Sounds like a good story to tell a jury. DanTex Oct 2012 #19
Do you mean Berserker Oct 2012 #22
I can't say that i'm shocked Oneka Oct 2012 #6
To paraphrase an attorneys' rule of thumb, TPaine7 Oct 2012 #12
+1, N/T Oneka Oct 2012 #20
Actually... Callisto32 Oct 2012 #30
Um... Reasonable_Argument Oct 2012 #31
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Politico: House Oversight...»Reply #7