Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
15. IOW, she was "discredited" by Republicans and gun bloggers.
Mon Oct 1, 2012, 06:25 PM
Oct 2012

When the Fortune report came out, I don't recall any non-right-wingers reacting with the kind outrage and disbelief that you saw among the gun fanatics. So apparently, to you, "those who care about reality" means right-wing crazies. Not too surprising.

Anyway, look, we get it. Gun nuts hate Eric Holder. They really wish they could pin a big conspiracy theory on him. That is why, whenever there is any ambiguity or contradictory testimony, you resolve it in the way that is most favorable to the Darrell Issa witch hunt. But, as the Fortune article (and the IG) pointed out, the facts of the case, and the totality of the evidence is not on your side. And by now pretty much everyone except for the lunatic fringe has accepted this and moved on. I mean, just the fact that the gun nuts have retreated from "Eric Holder intentionally armed the Mexican drug cartels" to "Fortune should issue a correction" shows how far we've come.

As I pointed out last time we discussed this, your clinging to conspiracy theories has much more to do with your inability to reason in the presence of uncertainty -- a trait that is very common among people with right-wing political views -- than with any facts. Your reasoning is not actually fact-based, it is based on a bunch of tenuous leaps of logic. You see conspiracies in places where a rational person without a political agenda would simply see uncertainty.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Intimidation is standard operating procedure for Republicans. Dawson Leery Oct 2012 #1
???! TPaine7 Oct 2012 #2
The Republicans (both in the house and in the Gungeon) are having trouble letting go their beloved DanTex Oct 2012 #3
Correct. This is why NO RETRACTION should be issued. Dawson Leery Oct 2012 #4
That is obvious and pathetic spin. TPaine7 Oct 2012 #5
I know this must be hard for you to accept, but the Fast and Furious "scandal" is over. DanTex Oct 2012 #7
In other words, you can't refute a word I said, so you'll stick to innuendo. Boring, but smart. n/t TPaine7 Oct 2012 #8
LOL. After being proved wrong, the gun fanatic will typically just repeat the false statement DanTex Oct 2012 #9
So you "prove" a discredited author right by citing the discredited author?! TPaine7 Oct 2012 #10
So you call an author "discredited" because she upset some Republicans by DanTex Oct 2012 #11
She was discredited long before the IG's report came out by those who care about reality as opposed TPaine7 Oct 2012 #13
IOW, she was "discredited" by Republicans and gun bloggers. DanTex Oct 2012 #15
Of course. Holder and Cngressional Democrats = Republicans and gun bloggers. TPaine7 Oct 2012 #17
Nope. Holder didn't actually say "the Fortune article is wrong." That would be you and the DanTex Oct 2012 #18
LOL! If only your humor were intentional. TPaine7 Oct 2012 #21
Wow. That was an, umm, interesting useless tangent! DanTex Oct 2012 #23
Sigh. "Those who care about reality" are Holder and congressional Democrats. And I put words in TPaine7 Oct 2012 #24
Well, it's easy to prove yourself right if you just make things up. DanTex Oct 2012 #26
since when was supporting whistle blower retaliation gejohnston Oct 2012 #27
that is an inane pant load gejohnston Oct 2012 #25
Again, it's you and the right-wing press versus the reality-based community. DanTex Oct 2012 #28
you don't know NRA talking points gejohnston Oct 2012 #29
DanTex is clueless about my sources and where I get my ideas. TPaine7 Oct 2012 #32
The people who agree with me—or whom I agree with—are AG Holder and congressional Democrats. TPaine7 Oct 2012 #33
Actually there was, gejohnston Oct 2012 #14
Please point out who is a Berserker Oct 2012 #16
Sounds like a good story to tell a jury. DanTex Oct 2012 #19
Do you mean Berserker Oct 2012 #22
I can't say that i'm shocked Oneka Oct 2012 #6
To paraphrase an attorneys' rule of thumb, TPaine7 Oct 2012 #12
+1, N/T Oneka Oct 2012 #20
Actually... Callisto32 Oct 2012 #30
Um... Reasonable_Argument Oct 2012 #31
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Politico: House Oversight...»Reply #15