Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Rep. Steve King (R-IA) Explains the Second Amendment [View all]Atypical Liberal
(5,412 posts)82. Again, IT IS CURRENTLY THE LAW OF THE LAND.
The 2A has about as much relevance today as the 3A. Eventually both will be understood to be anachronistic and meaningless.
It doesn't matter whether you think they are anachronistic and meaningless.
It is the law of the land in the United States.
But aside from that, the second amendment is not anachronistic nor meaningless. The motivations of man have not changed much for all of recorded history. The cliche that "power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely" is still as meaningful today as it ever was. The risk of tyranny and oppression are no different today than they were 200 years ago.
The founders set up a government with decentralized power for a reason, and those reasons are as valid today as they ever were. Worse, slowly but surely since the creation of this country the government has steadily increased and consolidated its power, directly counter to what the founders intended. This has allowed us to become one of the most powerful empires on Earth, but at what cost to our own liberty and that of people around the world?
It doesn't matter whether you think they are anachronistic and meaningless.
It is the law of the land in the United States.
But aside from that, the second amendment is not anachronistic nor meaningless. The motivations of man have not changed much for all of recorded history. The cliche that "power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely" is still as meaningful today as it ever was. The risk of tyranny and oppression are no different today than they were 200 years ago.
The founders set up a government with decentralized power for a reason, and those reasons are as valid today as they ever were. Worse, slowly but surely since the creation of this country the government has steadily increased and consolidated its power, directly counter to what the founders intended. This has allowed us to become one of the most powerful empires on Earth, but at what cost to our own liberty and that of people around the world?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
83 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Believeing one's own government "won't do it here" is really really dangerous.
Callisto32
Oct 2012
#52
Italy went from 'il Risorgimento' to Mussolini within one human lifetime.
friendly_iconoclast
Oct 2012
#59
Are there any other inanimate objects aside from guns that give you the willies?
friendly_iconoclast
Oct 2012
#58
By it, I meant "a dude walking down the street with a holstered gun," "it" being that scenario.
rogrot
Oct 2012
#62
no. You are conflating Individual Equality to the government for Treason.
Tuesday Afternoon
Oct 2012
#16
Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it. Our Founding Fathers, in order to
Tuesday Afternoon
Oct 2012
#14
Mike, you really do need to study the Constitution and history in general more carefully.nt
Eleanors38
Oct 2012
#23
Mike, how does one pronounce "Vietnam" and "Afghanistan" in Italian?
friendly_iconoclast
Oct 2012
#48
"You don't know enough about me to judge." Oh, we most certainly *do*, Mike/Jason/Baldr...
friendly_iconoclast
Oct 2012
#83
Anyone who claims our military has nothing to do with our defense is insane
4th law of robotics
Oct 2012
#56