Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

rl6214

(8,142 posts)
47. I asked a simple question, why the snark?
Tue Jan 10, 2012, 09:07 PM
Jan 2012

"A form get's filled out by whom? The buyer. What a joke. "

Failure to fill out the form truthfully IS a felony.



Would you also propose a system involving a psych. evaluation and sign off by a mental heath professional before being allowed to vote because I think voting can be much more dangerous than gun ownership as shown by the 2000 election.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Family Blames Gun-Seller for Murderous Rampage [View all] The Straight Story Jan 2012 OP
well duh...there's a law suit lottery to be won here. ileus Jan 2012 #1
Yeah, crappy psych analysis is done in this Group all the time. nt SteveW Jan 2012 #98
Did you know that having to stand in line is grounds for negligence? X_Digger Jan 2012 #2
A perfect example of why every state should pass Spoonman Jan 2012 #3
It would make people think twice about the shotgun approach to frivelous law suits. Remmah2 Jan 2012 #15
in theory it sounds good pipoman Jan 2012 #79
Amen to that !!! DWC Jan 2012 #95
How would it level the playing field? pipoman Jan 2012 #127
That's just ambulance-chasing. The suit has no merit whatsoever. slackmaster Jan 2012 #4
Just shows how the system is ineffective... ellisonz Jan 2012 #24
What would you propose to prevent someone who isn't legally disqualified from buying a gun... slackmaster Jan 2012 #30
The Justice system already plays that role... ellisonz Jan 2012 #32
in most states gejohnston Jan 2012 #43
What wrong with it? We_Have_A_Problem Jan 2012 #87
Yes, it is called "due process," as in the 5th Amendment. SteveW Jan 2012 #100
Should we have to be interviewed to exercise other Constitutional rights? Atypical Liberal Jan 2012 #85
It almost sounds like you're proposing police interviews and psych evaluations for someone to own a Wistful Vista Jan 2012 #113
Was he adjudicated mentally ill? MicaelS Jan 2012 #5
Why didn't his family or doctor report it? Remmah2 Jan 2012 #16
I too, accurately diagnose people's mental health at a glance. AtheistCrusader Jan 2012 #6
Hey, what's the problem? Bill Frist diagnosed Terri Schiavo without ever even SEEING her! Wistful Vista Jan 2012 #115
I find the title somewhat inflammatory. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #7
"Might teach sellers of guns to be more responsible." Glassunion Jan 2012 #8
Well, ST has no problem diagnosing mental illness based on internet posts.. X_Digger Jan 2012 #9
Apparently it was pretty obvious with this guy Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #10
What if you were a legal seller? ileus Jan 2012 #11
I'm not following you? Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #12
And if you refused to sell a gun to someone legally qualified you could be sued for that. GreenStormCloud Jan 2012 #13
Jeez GSC, now peddler is a pejorative. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #21
Peddler Glassunion Jan 2012 #36
Hey, you are absolutely right. My mistake. Shopkeepers. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #37
A merchant has the right to refuse service to anyone at his discretion Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #27
You miss the point. PavePusher Jan 2012 #17
I don't think so. Glassunion Jan 2012 #20
My questionnaire would be a follow-up Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #22
Lol, what about other 'potentially dangerous, especially in the wrong hands' substances / items, eh? X_Digger Jan 2012 #28
Those things have already been prescribed by a doctor Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #40
But each item is 'potentially dangerous, especially in the wrong hands'- your criteria, not mine. X_Digger Jan 2012 #46
Are you being intentionally obtuse? Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #49
So the seller of the 'dangerous item' has no onus to perform an assessment, yes? X_Digger Jan 2012 #55
My mind is a work in progress Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #59
Perhaps you should wait until you've moved past the design stage.... We_Have_A_Problem Jan 2012 #88
Such a charmer aren't you WHAP? Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #90
Your ideas are not being thoughtlessy dismissed We_Have_A_Problem Jan 2012 #91
So I need a doctor's approval to exercise a right? jeepnstein Jan 2012 #96
"So I need a doctor's approval to exercise a right?" Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #97
So the 2nd Amendment isn't really the law of the land? jeepnstein Jan 2012 #130
I'm afraid that you are quite ignorant on the subject of psychology. Glassunion Jan 2012 #34
My knowledge or "ignorance" of psychology is irrelevant. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #38
Personally, I would force NICS compliance by the states. Glassunion Jan 2012 #92
Thanks for a constructive post. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #104
Loughner slipped through many cracks. Glassunion Jan 2012 #108
Regarding the MMPI test Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #111
Actually its pretty damned relevant. We_Have_A_Problem Jan 2012 #94
Actually I do. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #99
The law requires a form 4473 be filled out by the purchaser rl6214 Jan 2012 #29
Well, isn't that brilliant? Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #39
I asked a simple question, why the snark? rl6214 Jan 2012 #47
No snark intended. I'm pointing out the flaw in the system. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #52
If he lies on the form, the subsequent check will pick it up. Straw Man Jan 2012 #56
How about psychological screening by mental health professionals. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #58
Are you asking for a positive verification of mental health... Straw Man Jan 2012 #170
You bring up excellent points. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #171
One more question. Straw Man Jan 2012 #180
Who would pay for this evaluation? Would it be necessary for each purchase, or... Marengo Jan 2012 #82
It takes years of training in addition to medical school to qualify a person to identify a paranoid slackmaster Jan 2012 #31
This is not the responsibility of gun dealers. Atypical Liberal Jan 2012 #86
A complete circumvention of the 5th... SteveW Jan 2012 #101
How could they be more responsible within the laws? ObamaFTW2012 Jan 2012 #18
New laws/rules. Read my other posts. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #42
I didn't write the headline, hell I don't even read what I post The Straight Story Jan 2012 #19
I never suggested that you wrote the headline. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #23
The system as is undoubtedly invades our rights. She should have had a gun too... ellisonz Jan 2012 #25
More nonsense from you ProgressiveProfessor Jan 2012 #48
OK more nonsense from me Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #50
Fairly straight forward ProgressiveProfessor Jan 2012 #61
My CHL in Texas covers that. oneshooter Jan 2012 #62
What prevents a forgery from being used? ProgressiveProfessor Jan 2012 #63
Don't know. They are just like a Texas DL oneshooter Jan 2012 #65
Works for me ProgressiveProfessor Jan 2012 #69
"voting, free press, or assembly? They are on the same level" Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #67
Yes, they are. beevul Jan 2012 #68
Serious bad analogy... ProgressiveProfessor Jan 2012 #70
Oh sorry. My mistake again. Meant airline pilots. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #72
Actually you are still wrong there ProgressiveProfessor Jan 2012 #74
" My answer to the problem is to first enforce and standardize the laws we have" Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #134
The general answer to violations of the law is punishment ProgressiveProfessor Jan 2012 #137
"Brings a warm feeling to my heart." Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #144
More specious comments ProgressiveProfessor Jan 2012 #148
Hardly a capricious system, but rather a smart one. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #162
Using guns to shoot and kill people is not evil in and of itself. We_Have_A_Problem Jan 2012 #165
Of course they need to be able to defend themselves. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #166
Who the fuck are YOU to decide what the answer is? We_Have_A_Problem Jan 2012 #167
Did I ever suggest that it wasn't their call? Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #169
I have slight issue with the data presented Glassunion Jan 2012 #168
I always have slight issues with data too Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #173
"I wish them luck." Simo 1939_1940 Jan 2012 #150
And if you asked a lot of people back in the 50s and 60s.... We_Have_A_Problem Jan 2012 #154
I'm sure that mindset still exists in Texas and much of the south. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #157
WOW! We_Have_A_Problem Jan 2012 #158
Are you suggesting it doesn't still exist? Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #161
I think you missed the point We_Have_A_Problem Jan 2012 #163
I didn't miss a thing WHAP Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #174
Most every state that has concealed carry requires a license rl6214 Jan 2012 #129
What am I doing to get it done? Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #133
Your "common sense" is not the same as my common sense rl6214 Jan 2012 #191
Fortunately, I wasn't counting on you or any other individual Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #192
Ain't that the truth... rl6214 Jan 2012 #195
With a gun one might be able to kill a few dozen people. PavePusher Jan 2012 #84
Improve system by funding (if you can afford it) the bureaucracy to pass-on mental cases. SteveW Jan 2012 #102
Nonsense Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #106
BIG difference between.... We_Have_A_Problem Jan 2012 #109
Now you are being silly Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #119
"Poor people can't afford guns... Too busy putting food on the table and no valuables to protect" X_Digger Jan 2012 #120
How about their lives? Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #123
The poor are more likely to be in neighborhoods with high crime and little opportunity to leave.. X_Digger Jan 2012 #126
You need to chill, especially if you carry a gun. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #132
Your suggestions are specious and not possible under our current legal structure ProgressiveProfessor Jan 2012 #138
I expected better from you. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #142
I am clearly discussing gun onwership in a self defense and urban context ProgressiveProfessor Jan 2012 #146
Brilliant! Just fucking brilliant! Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #147
Empowering individuals is indeed quite progressive ProgressiveProfessor Jan 2012 #149
Sorry, but encouraging people to carry guns is not empowering them Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #185
sorry gejohnston Jan 2012 #187
Providing people with options and knowledge is indeed progressie ProgressiveProfessor Jan 2012 #194
And now you insinuate mental instability. Speaking of "engage in insults"... n/t PavePusher Jan 2012 #140
WTF are you insinuating? What mental instability? Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #141
Your words: "You need to chill, especially if you carry a gun." n/t PavePusher Jan 2012 #151
You equate anger with mental instability? Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #160
Hahahahah! It was you that made the insinuation.... PavePusher Jan 2012 #181
No my friend, you connected those little dots all on your own Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #184
You don't have the power to make me angry. X_Digger Jan 2012 #189
Very glad to hear that. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #190
"I guess poor is a relative term." -- fucking duh. X_Digger Jan 2012 #188
No, sir. SteveW Jan 2012 #117
What is more important to you? Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #145
You can try to be more respectful than "patsy for the NRA and extreme RW..." SteveW Jan 2012 #193
No. If you want it, you get to help pay for it. n/t PavePusher Jan 2012 #139
If and when I buy a gun I'll be happy to pay my share. Why not? Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #143
Nice dodge. PavePusher Jan 2012 #153
Your analogies get funnier by the day Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #159
Let's finance the Coast Guard by taxing boat and ship owners. Why not? friendly_iconoclast Jan 2012 #155
Boats and ships are taxed and do help fund the Coast Guard. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #156
Most of their funding comes via the DHS appropriation. friendly_iconoclast Jan 2012 #164
The USCG performs many functions, as does the fire department Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #172
Gun owners *already* pay the taxes you call for friendly_iconoclast Jan 2012 #177
"They help to fund" oneshooter Jan 2012 #175
Why? Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #176
Why not? A 10-11% excise tax on marine related items would be a start. friendly_iconoclast Jan 2012 #178
We have plenty of those taxes/fees and they are justified. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #179
You misunderstand, I have no problem with Pittman-Robertson taxes. friendly_iconoclast Jan 2012 #182
No assumption on my part. I had no idea. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #183
The Robertson was gejohnston Jan 2012 #186
2005 PLCAA will take care of that suit. N/T GreenStormCloud Jan 2012 #14
what a crock of shit rl6214 Jan 2012 #26
This whole thing is obviously the fault of the negligent seller and the manufacturer. TPaine7 Jan 2012 #33
So we now need a MSW to sell guns? BiggJawn Jan 2012 #35
Now why would a mentally ill person lie? Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #41
I dunno, let's ask my first ex-wife... BiggJawn Jan 2012 #44
So would you believe her if you were selling her a gun? Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #45
"She did a pretty good job of hiding it while we were married." rl6214 Jan 2012 #51
On our second martini are we? Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #53
No, I don't drink rl6214 Jan 2012 #54
Congrats on your marriage. Sorry about the Type 1 diabetes. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #60
I really think that it is unworkable. oneshooter Jan 2012 #64
It may be expensive. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #66
"I don't see how it could be illegal" ProgressiveProfessor Jan 2012 #71
Wrong again. The system needs to be fixed, if you want a system. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #73
The system needs to execute under the existing framework ProgressiveProfessor Jan 2012 #76
And what of purchasers of other potential lethal implements? Marengo Jan 2012 #83
You're not talking about fixing a system We_Have_A_Problem Jan 2012 #89
Maybe... discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2012 #93
Why? Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #107
Why not? We_Have_A_Problem Jan 2012 #110
Apples and oranges. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #112
How do you figure? We_Have_A_Problem Jan 2012 #114
Actually, a printer's ink / paper tax was already ruled unconstitutional.. X_Digger Jan 2012 #116
I know it was We_Have_A_Problem Jan 2012 #131
If you can be... discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2012 #121
No right would be denied anymore than at present. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #122
True enough! discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2012 #124
I'm talking about firearms Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #135
Wait a minute. discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2012 #136
There's the key word: Mental Health PROFESSIONAL. BiggJawn Jan 2012 #81
That's what the phone call is for. Straw Man Jan 2012 #57
Do not confuse the bubba with facts and logic ProgressiveProfessor Jan 2012 #78
No need. Use the volunteer psychs right in this thread. nt SteveW Jan 2012 #103
family is even suing the rotary club sponsor who dropped off the victim at the club. aikoaiko Jan 2012 #75
More than just them ProgressiveProfessor Jan 2012 #77
Somewhere in there the right numbers for this lottery... ileus Jan 2012 #80
Sue! Sue! A Boy named Sue! The whole Sioux Nation! nt SteveW Jan 2012 #105
I see J. Randolph Pickett recovered from his injuries when that ambulance backed over him. Wistful Vista Jan 2012 #118
re: "...gun shop should have trained their people to recognize depression..." discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2012 #125
Plantiff is crazy. E6-B Jan 2012 #128
I predict treble damages awarded to the pawn shop. Tejas Jan 2012 #152
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Family Blames Gun-Seller ...»Reply #47