A steep drop in crime, but do you feel safer?

[X_Digger]

36. One of his biographers attributes it to him, or uses it as a summation of his position.

There's also a purported letter saying something similar- ("Monsieur, je déteste ce que vous écrivez, mais je donnerai ma vie pour que vous puissiez continuer à écrire&quot "Monsieur, I detest what you have written, but I would give my life to make it possible for you to continue to write."

Now, how does the ninth amendment justify abrogating a person's rights without due process? If we're throwing around amendments..

[div class='excerpt']No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

You see, all the restrictions set out in the 1968 GCA follow a judgement / adjudication / tribunal -- due process.