Let's try this again, maybe this time someone can answer the question.

[GitRDun]

11. The 2nd Amendment and Miller

I am no expert in this area. My layman's understanding is that with regard to the 2nd Amendment, one side feels the 2nd Amendment only provides for weapons in defense of the state/country, while the other believes in a universal right to bear arms. I am with the latter crowd. The Miller case, which I suspect most know about said that the government could regulate guns not needed for defense / state militias. I do not have much knowledge about state constitutional law.

My references to hunting are merely my thoughts on what would be reasonable government regulation of guns in light of US v. Miller.

Based on some of the other comments, I may not have the right idea about WHAT the regulations should be, but that is where I think the competition for ideas belongs.