Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Starboard Tack

(11,181 posts)
184. No my friend, you connected those little dots all on your own
Sat Jan 14, 2012, 02:17 AM
Jan 2012

I sensed anger coming from x-digger and suggested he chill. I know he carries a gun and I don't think it's a good idea to carry a gun when you are really angry. I don't really know the guy, but based on stuff he's told me in the past, I would not want to be around when he is angry.
You decided to chime in and interpret my advice, gratuitous as it may have been, as inferring mental instability. That's on you. Own it or change it.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Family Blames Gun-Seller for Murderous Rampage [View all] The Straight Story Jan 2012 OP
well duh...there's a law suit lottery to be won here. ileus Jan 2012 #1
Yeah, crappy psych analysis is done in this Group all the time. nt SteveW Jan 2012 #98
Did you know that having to stand in line is grounds for negligence? X_Digger Jan 2012 #2
A perfect example of why every state should pass Spoonman Jan 2012 #3
It would make people think twice about the shotgun approach to frivelous law suits. Remmah2 Jan 2012 #15
in theory it sounds good pipoman Jan 2012 #79
Amen to that !!! DWC Jan 2012 #95
How would it level the playing field? pipoman Jan 2012 #127
That's just ambulance-chasing. The suit has no merit whatsoever. slackmaster Jan 2012 #4
Just shows how the system is ineffective... ellisonz Jan 2012 #24
What would you propose to prevent someone who isn't legally disqualified from buying a gun... slackmaster Jan 2012 #30
The Justice system already plays that role... ellisonz Jan 2012 #32
in most states gejohnston Jan 2012 #43
What wrong with it? We_Have_A_Problem Jan 2012 #87
Yes, it is called "due process," as in the 5th Amendment. SteveW Jan 2012 #100
Should we have to be interviewed to exercise other Constitutional rights? Atypical Liberal Jan 2012 #85
It almost sounds like you're proposing police interviews and psych evaluations for someone to own a Wistful Vista Jan 2012 #113
Was he adjudicated mentally ill? MicaelS Jan 2012 #5
Why didn't his family or doctor report it? Remmah2 Jan 2012 #16
I too, accurately diagnose people's mental health at a glance. AtheistCrusader Jan 2012 #6
Hey, what's the problem? Bill Frist diagnosed Terri Schiavo without ever even SEEING her! Wistful Vista Jan 2012 #115
I find the title somewhat inflammatory. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #7
"Might teach sellers of guns to be more responsible." Glassunion Jan 2012 #8
Well, ST has no problem diagnosing mental illness based on internet posts.. X_Digger Jan 2012 #9
Apparently it was pretty obvious with this guy Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #10
What if you were a legal seller? ileus Jan 2012 #11
I'm not following you? Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #12
And if you refused to sell a gun to someone legally qualified you could be sued for that. GreenStormCloud Jan 2012 #13
Jeez GSC, now peddler is a pejorative. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #21
Peddler Glassunion Jan 2012 #36
Hey, you are absolutely right. My mistake. Shopkeepers. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #37
A merchant has the right to refuse service to anyone at his discretion Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #27
You miss the point. PavePusher Jan 2012 #17
I don't think so. Glassunion Jan 2012 #20
My questionnaire would be a follow-up Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #22
Lol, what about other 'potentially dangerous, especially in the wrong hands' substances / items, eh? X_Digger Jan 2012 #28
Those things have already been prescribed by a doctor Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #40
But each item is 'potentially dangerous, especially in the wrong hands'- your criteria, not mine. X_Digger Jan 2012 #46
Are you being intentionally obtuse? Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #49
So the seller of the 'dangerous item' has no onus to perform an assessment, yes? X_Digger Jan 2012 #55
My mind is a work in progress Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #59
Perhaps you should wait until you've moved past the design stage.... We_Have_A_Problem Jan 2012 #88
Such a charmer aren't you WHAP? Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #90
Your ideas are not being thoughtlessy dismissed We_Have_A_Problem Jan 2012 #91
So I need a doctor's approval to exercise a right? jeepnstein Jan 2012 #96
"So I need a doctor's approval to exercise a right?" Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #97
So the 2nd Amendment isn't really the law of the land? jeepnstein Jan 2012 #130
I'm afraid that you are quite ignorant on the subject of psychology. Glassunion Jan 2012 #34
My knowledge or "ignorance" of psychology is irrelevant. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #38
Personally, I would force NICS compliance by the states. Glassunion Jan 2012 #92
Thanks for a constructive post. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #104
Loughner slipped through many cracks. Glassunion Jan 2012 #108
Regarding the MMPI test Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #111
Actually its pretty damned relevant. We_Have_A_Problem Jan 2012 #94
Actually I do. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #99
The law requires a form 4473 be filled out by the purchaser rl6214 Jan 2012 #29
Well, isn't that brilliant? Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #39
I asked a simple question, why the snark? rl6214 Jan 2012 #47
No snark intended. I'm pointing out the flaw in the system. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #52
If he lies on the form, the subsequent check will pick it up. Straw Man Jan 2012 #56
How about psychological screening by mental health professionals. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #58
Are you asking for a positive verification of mental health... Straw Man Jan 2012 #170
You bring up excellent points. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #171
One more question. Straw Man Jan 2012 #180
Who would pay for this evaluation? Would it be necessary for each purchase, or... Marengo Jan 2012 #82
It takes years of training in addition to medical school to qualify a person to identify a paranoid slackmaster Jan 2012 #31
This is not the responsibility of gun dealers. Atypical Liberal Jan 2012 #86
A complete circumvention of the 5th... SteveW Jan 2012 #101
How could they be more responsible within the laws? ObamaFTW2012 Jan 2012 #18
New laws/rules. Read my other posts. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #42
I didn't write the headline, hell I don't even read what I post The Straight Story Jan 2012 #19
I never suggested that you wrote the headline. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #23
The system as is undoubtedly invades our rights. She should have had a gun too... ellisonz Jan 2012 #25
More nonsense from you ProgressiveProfessor Jan 2012 #48
OK more nonsense from me Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #50
Fairly straight forward ProgressiveProfessor Jan 2012 #61
My CHL in Texas covers that. oneshooter Jan 2012 #62
What prevents a forgery from being used? ProgressiveProfessor Jan 2012 #63
Don't know. They are just like a Texas DL oneshooter Jan 2012 #65
Works for me ProgressiveProfessor Jan 2012 #69
"voting, free press, or assembly? They are on the same level" Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #67
Yes, they are. beevul Jan 2012 #68
Serious bad analogy... ProgressiveProfessor Jan 2012 #70
Oh sorry. My mistake again. Meant airline pilots. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #72
Actually you are still wrong there ProgressiveProfessor Jan 2012 #74
" My answer to the problem is to first enforce and standardize the laws we have" Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #134
The general answer to violations of the law is punishment ProgressiveProfessor Jan 2012 #137
"Brings a warm feeling to my heart." Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #144
More specious comments ProgressiveProfessor Jan 2012 #148
Hardly a capricious system, but rather a smart one. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #162
Using guns to shoot and kill people is not evil in and of itself. We_Have_A_Problem Jan 2012 #165
Of course they need to be able to defend themselves. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #166
Who the fuck are YOU to decide what the answer is? We_Have_A_Problem Jan 2012 #167
Did I ever suggest that it wasn't their call? Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #169
I have slight issue with the data presented Glassunion Jan 2012 #168
I always have slight issues with data too Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #173
"I wish them luck." Simo 1939_1940 Jan 2012 #150
And if you asked a lot of people back in the 50s and 60s.... We_Have_A_Problem Jan 2012 #154
I'm sure that mindset still exists in Texas and much of the south. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #157
WOW! We_Have_A_Problem Jan 2012 #158
Are you suggesting it doesn't still exist? Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #161
I think you missed the point We_Have_A_Problem Jan 2012 #163
I didn't miss a thing WHAP Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #174
Most every state that has concealed carry requires a license rl6214 Jan 2012 #129
What am I doing to get it done? Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #133
Your "common sense" is not the same as my common sense rl6214 Jan 2012 #191
Fortunately, I wasn't counting on you or any other individual Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #192
Ain't that the truth... rl6214 Jan 2012 #195
With a gun one might be able to kill a few dozen people. PavePusher Jan 2012 #84
Improve system by funding (if you can afford it) the bureaucracy to pass-on mental cases. SteveW Jan 2012 #102
Nonsense Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #106
BIG difference between.... We_Have_A_Problem Jan 2012 #109
Now you are being silly Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #119
"Poor people can't afford guns... Too busy putting food on the table and no valuables to protect" X_Digger Jan 2012 #120
How about their lives? Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #123
The poor are more likely to be in neighborhoods with high crime and little opportunity to leave.. X_Digger Jan 2012 #126
You need to chill, especially if you carry a gun. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #132
Your suggestions are specious and not possible under our current legal structure ProgressiveProfessor Jan 2012 #138
I expected better from you. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #142
I am clearly discussing gun onwership in a self defense and urban context ProgressiveProfessor Jan 2012 #146
Brilliant! Just fucking brilliant! Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #147
Empowering individuals is indeed quite progressive ProgressiveProfessor Jan 2012 #149
Sorry, but encouraging people to carry guns is not empowering them Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #185
sorry gejohnston Jan 2012 #187
Providing people with options and knowledge is indeed progressie ProgressiveProfessor Jan 2012 #194
And now you insinuate mental instability. Speaking of "engage in insults"... n/t PavePusher Jan 2012 #140
WTF are you insinuating? What mental instability? Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #141
Your words: "You need to chill, especially if you carry a gun." n/t PavePusher Jan 2012 #151
You equate anger with mental instability? Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #160
Hahahahah! It was you that made the insinuation.... PavePusher Jan 2012 #181
No my friend, you connected those little dots all on your own Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #184
You don't have the power to make me angry. X_Digger Jan 2012 #189
Very glad to hear that. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #190
"I guess poor is a relative term." -- fucking duh. X_Digger Jan 2012 #188
No, sir. SteveW Jan 2012 #117
What is more important to you? Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #145
You can try to be more respectful than "patsy for the NRA and extreme RW..." SteveW Jan 2012 #193
No. If you want it, you get to help pay for it. n/t PavePusher Jan 2012 #139
If and when I buy a gun I'll be happy to pay my share. Why not? Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #143
Nice dodge. PavePusher Jan 2012 #153
Your analogies get funnier by the day Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #159
Let's finance the Coast Guard by taxing boat and ship owners. Why not? friendly_iconoclast Jan 2012 #155
Boats and ships are taxed and do help fund the Coast Guard. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #156
Most of their funding comes via the DHS appropriation. friendly_iconoclast Jan 2012 #164
The USCG performs many functions, as does the fire department Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #172
Gun owners *already* pay the taxes you call for friendly_iconoclast Jan 2012 #177
"They help to fund" oneshooter Jan 2012 #175
Why? Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #176
Why not? A 10-11% excise tax on marine related items would be a start. friendly_iconoclast Jan 2012 #178
We have plenty of those taxes/fees and they are justified. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #179
You misunderstand, I have no problem with Pittman-Robertson taxes. friendly_iconoclast Jan 2012 #182
No assumption on my part. I had no idea. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #183
The Robertson was gejohnston Jan 2012 #186
2005 PLCAA will take care of that suit. N/T GreenStormCloud Jan 2012 #14
what a crock of shit rl6214 Jan 2012 #26
This whole thing is obviously the fault of the negligent seller and the manufacturer. TPaine7 Jan 2012 #33
So we now need a MSW to sell guns? BiggJawn Jan 2012 #35
Now why would a mentally ill person lie? Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #41
I dunno, let's ask my first ex-wife... BiggJawn Jan 2012 #44
So would you believe her if you were selling her a gun? Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #45
"She did a pretty good job of hiding it while we were married." rl6214 Jan 2012 #51
On our second martini are we? Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #53
No, I don't drink rl6214 Jan 2012 #54
Congrats on your marriage. Sorry about the Type 1 diabetes. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #60
I really think that it is unworkable. oneshooter Jan 2012 #64
It may be expensive. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #66
"I don't see how it could be illegal" ProgressiveProfessor Jan 2012 #71
Wrong again. The system needs to be fixed, if you want a system. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #73
The system needs to execute under the existing framework ProgressiveProfessor Jan 2012 #76
And what of purchasers of other potential lethal implements? Marengo Jan 2012 #83
You're not talking about fixing a system We_Have_A_Problem Jan 2012 #89
Maybe... discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2012 #93
Why? Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #107
Why not? We_Have_A_Problem Jan 2012 #110
Apples and oranges. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #112
How do you figure? We_Have_A_Problem Jan 2012 #114
Actually, a printer's ink / paper tax was already ruled unconstitutional.. X_Digger Jan 2012 #116
I know it was We_Have_A_Problem Jan 2012 #131
If you can be... discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2012 #121
No right would be denied anymore than at present. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #122
True enough! discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2012 #124
I'm talking about firearms Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #135
Wait a minute. discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2012 #136
There's the key word: Mental Health PROFESSIONAL. BiggJawn Jan 2012 #81
That's what the phone call is for. Straw Man Jan 2012 #57
Do not confuse the bubba with facts and logic ProgressiveProfessor Jan 2012 #78
No need. Use the volunteer psychs right in this thread. nt SteveW Jan 2012 #103
family is even suing the rotary club sponsor who dropped off the victim at the club. aikoaiko Jan 2012 #75
More than just them ProgressiveProfessor Jan 2012 #77
Somewhere in there the right numbers for this lottery... ileus Jan 2012 #80
Sue! Sue! A Boy named Sue! The whole Sioux Nation! nt SteveW Jan 2012 #105
I see J. Randolph Pickett recovered from his injuries when that ambulance backed over him. Wistful Vista Jan 2012 #118
re: "...gun shop should have trained their people to recognize depression..." discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2012 #125
Plantiff is crazy. E6-B Jan 2012 #128
I predict treble damages awarded to the pawn shop. Tejas Jan 2012 #152
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Family Blames Gun-Seller ...»Reply #184