Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Trayvon Martin Shooting Target [View all]Starboard Tack
(11,181 posts)49. Take your bigotry somewhere else, like back to the Tea Party where you obviously belong
"As an immigrant, you could always leave" Real classy.
No wonder you have no problem with hate speech
No wonder you have no problem with hate speech
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
57 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Agree. There are many such things, e.g toilet paper with Bush or Obama's picture on each sheet.
jody
Dec 2012
#2
Many countries still support freedom of speech yet have sensible legislation against hate speech.
Starboard Tack
Dec 2012
#9
" I don't understand why you think that we should care about other countries laws".
Jenoch
Dec 2012
#31
If you read any of the laws enacted in other democratic countries you would know
Starboard Tack
Dec 2012
#30
It's not about getting insulted. Individuals can be insulted and insuly anyone.
Starboard Tack
Dec 2012
#51
You always have the right to march. The restrictions are only on hate speech
Starboard Tack
Dec 2012
#25
Take your bigotry somewhere else, like back to the Tea Party where you obviously belong
Starboard Tack
Dec 2012
#49
Then you'd better start telling SCOTUS to review the following decisions
Starboard Tack
Dec 2012
#47
How do you propose "1A and 2A need to be revisited" when they are unalienable/inalienable rights?
jody
Dec 2012
#18