Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Heinous. [View all]frazee
(61 posts)40. The survey on gun ownership was conducted
by the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Now, I have no idea of the ratio of "proper hands" versus improper ones among the respondents, but I'm guessing that not too many owners with "improper hands" answered in the affirmative, especially since the group has a spooky word like "surveillance" in their name. If true, then what is being measured may be what you call "guns in the proper hands," whatever that means.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
47 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I'm not familiar with the NRA particular positions. Where's your factual support for your
AnotherMcIntosh
Dec 2012
#27
Your statement "the NRA ... would have us believe that more guns mean more safety" is not supported
AnotherMcIntosh
Dec 2012
#33
Umm, yeah, but as the authors point out, guns get transferred from legal to illegal owners.
DanTex
Dec 2012
#5
Yeah, guns are such a big deterrent to crime, they're one of top theft targets!
MightyMopar
Dec 2012
#28
The stats are yours, as is your claim that "the NRA ... would have us believe that more guns mean
AnotherMcIntosh
Dec 2012
#34
really confused, especially considering post #11 whereby he states that the stats are his
Tuesday Afternoon
Dec 2012
#14
Except "more guns" isn't what is being said, so your hypothesis is false from the begining.
PavePusher
Dec 2012
#36