Guns and colleges make formula for tragedy

[X_Digger]

97. It appears that you just don't want strict scrutiny, so..

.. whatever means you can attempt to get it, the end is justified.

[div class='excerpt']where there had been none before, either implicitly or explicitly.

Err.. See Presser and Cruikshank for both explicit and implicit.

But now I understand. Your 'end' can't tolerate an individual right (or more properly, a 'fundamental' right-- you might want to get your terms right, it would change your debate. You'd stop getting corrected on that moronic line of *cough* reasoning, and you could focus on something with firmer ground.)

eta:

[div class='excerpt']Government can restrict ownership to classes it deems prohibited so long as in totality the this right is not "infringed."

So long as *someone* can vote, the right to vote isn't infringed?!?

So long as *someone* can pray, the first amendment isn't infringed?!?

So long as *someone* can protest, the first amendment isn't infringed?!?

That reasoning isn't borne out anywhere that I'm aware.