Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: gun violence control through mandatory liability insurance and taxation - from Forbes [View all]discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,771 posts)72. I am aware of:
- the individual cost issues after a death. I've dealt with enough.
- that each person killed by a firearm, is usually shot, whether by accident or on purpose is not fiscally significant.
- that family members of the dead may or may not have worked before the death and may or may not work after.
- mostly what a high percentage of those murdered had long criminal histories, had contributed to the overall cost of crime, may have killed innocents in the past and may have gone on to continue a life of crime and perhaps murder.
Each death by whatever means is regrettable but not all deaths make a negative entry in life's journal.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
111 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
gun violence control through mandatory liability insurance and taxation - from Forbes [View all]
Dog Gone at Penigma
Dec 2012
OP
So, you claim to know what an entire magazine wants? Or are you just mindreading the author?
Dog Gone at Penigma
Dec 2012
#64
apparently you have no respect for the role that Medical examiners play in criminology
Dog Gone at Penigma
Dec 2012
#100
Oh, national review has declined tremendously since the days of Buckly.
Dog Gone at Penigma
Dec 2012
#103
I refer you to all of the research on the topic of substitution in means of suicides (or lack of it)
Dog Gone at Penigma
Dec 2012
#63
1%ers telling the rest of us how to live are very popular with that lot these days
friendly_iconoclast
Dec 2012
#10
Existing liability policies generally cover damage from accidental or negligent discharges
slackmaster
Dec 2012
#8
that would likely change in the event that more gun owners sought liability insurance
Dog Gone at Penigma
Dec 2012
#23
Liability insurance that covered only gun-related incidents would be extremely inexpensive
slackmaster
Dec 2012
#71
FBI reports "Hands, fists, feet, etc." commit 5.7% of murders, Rifles and Shotguns for 5.4%.
jody
Dec 2012
#11
riders, or changing more policies to all risk, or adding guns as a named risk
Dog Gone at Penigma
Dec 2012
#24
1% drivel. Liability insurance takes away responsibility and accountability.
Starboard Tack
Dec 2012
#13
a different post, but one that expands on possible ways it could improve things
Dog Gone at Penigma
Dec 2012
#31
I had a $800 gun stolen while doing everything the restrictionists want me to do.
PavePusher
Dec 2012
#85
Liability policies universally exclude payouts for damages caused by criminal acts by...
slackmaster
Dec 2012
#44
Is suicide by leaping off a bridge 'bridge violence'? 'gravity violence'?
AtheistCrusader
Dec 2012
#59
I agree - impose insurance requirement - I've started a petition at WhiteHousePetitions. Please HELP
wanttosavetheplanet
Dec 2012
#87