Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: gun violence control through mandatory liability insurance and taxation - from Forbes [View all]gejohnston
(17,502 posts)No I don't. I do respect their work in forensic science, which is not criminology. Kellerman isn't an ME, He is an ER doctor.
Your 87 percent number includes suicides, which is not "gun violence" unless you want to talk about rope violence.
Depending on definition of children used, could be. Most definitions are anyone 12 and under. The Brady Campaign and VPC often use 24.
Please read:
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/09/28/after-a-horrific-summer-of-murder-chicago-trying-a-bold-new-approach.html
http://intjforum.com/showthread.php?p=3138085
http://www.mlive.com/news/flint/index.ssf/2012/09/at_least_21_of_flints_52_homic.html
http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/nation/2007-08-31-criminal-target_N.htm
I found this kind of amusing
BTW, unless National Review changed a lot since Bill Buckley's death, it is right of center like Forbes. Granted it is geared more towards the more intellectual conservative, like Mr. Buckley himself was. I won't alert because it is an easy mistake to make in this age of faux outdoorswomen, gold hawking rodeo clowns, and draft dodging blowhards being what passes for conservatism's intellectual trust.